Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su

Essay topics:

Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

Education styles have always been a controversial debate recent years. While formal education has numerous merits for students, teachers, and society, some believe it could limit our minds and spirits to a narrow path. I strongly disagree with this statement and I think formal education's advantages deserve to disadvantages.

For the past centuries, formal education provide a great situation for students and guide them for improvement ranging from learning reading and writing to investigation for finding cure for diseases. For example, scientists use formal education and results of its finding to improve cure of cancer while without that it might lead to sporadic study and survey which may never lead to the result.

Another benefit of formal education is that present guideline and instruction for students, teachers and, parents. Without formal education student would miss their way and sporadic reading and experiment may waste their time and their energy. For example, a teenager which want to be an engineer easily could choose their major in the high school and university and pursue the curriculum of that major to achieve her goal. On the other hand, if she wanted to just read books and follow them might get embaressed of the result and always ask herself this method is right or not.

However, some claim formal education destroy sense of innovation of students and school and university style limit thinking methods of them. They learn think in just in some ways that have been learnt while it may have some other methods which lead to success more easily then formal education.
Although I do understand their anxious and accept to some extent their ideas, nevertheless, these weak points could be solved by some changes in school management or university curriculum and it is not necessary to change all of the structure.

In conclusion, though formal education may have some disadvantages and limit the spirits and minds of the student to some extent, I strongly reckon merits of formal education really deserve disadvantages and with some action the effects of these disadvantages could be lessened.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-01-17 jenas 66 view
2023-09-18 Omar Ibna Nazim 50 view
2023-07-22 Jonginn 66 view
2023-07-18 s.sim 66 view
2023-07-09 KruthiHK 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user ali.rs :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 134, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to read'.
Suggestion: to read
...m for improvement ranging from learning reading and writing to investigation for findin...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 153, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to think'
Suggestion: to think
...it thinking methods of them. They learn think in just in some ways that have been lea...
^^^^^
Line 8, column 223, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...culum and it is not necessary to change all of the structure. In conclusion, though for...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, nevertheless, really, so, then, while, for example, i think, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1795.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 343.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2332361516 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65443849812 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 215.323595506 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524781341108 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 550.8 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.5984805909 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.076923077 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3846153846 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 5.21951772744 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174526556189 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0702141919472 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.042102584252 0.0758088955206 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0956795458548 0.150359130593 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0495307396988 0.0667264976115 74% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 14.1392134831 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.