Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Government by definition is a system that administrate the nation and introduce many policies according to the needs of its society. Political leaders and government officials master this system. On the other hand, often people are not well informed to present their will to government. The prompt suggests in similar direction that government should take decisions based on their own assessment instead of following the demand of people. I mostly agree with the prompt that government should assess independently and take decision for two reasons. However, I do concede that in extreme cases adhering to public demand is beneficial.
First of all, government is responsible to manage the need of the nation along with balancing the welfare of citizens. But public demand or protest against government may always not be in favour of nation. For example, In a developing country, the government decided to construct a dam in one of nation's river. However, the execution of this project requires relocation of local population. Because public can not anticipate the benefits in long run, they are prone to influential and prejudiced views of activists and may protect against the proposed construction. However, government needs to make them aware and informed about the benefits like development, employment, business growth, education and economic support to nation etc., rather than agree to their demands.
Furthermore, in close view the good governance should possess qualities like compassion, open mindedness, non-discrimination and determination. On the contrary, public mostly are selfish in their demand and do not consider other side. Hence, serving as per public will will be detrimental. For example, if government passes a policy to protect transgender rights for education, job or healthcare, protesters will argue that these 'special' favors will cause injustice to their kids and affect their rights in future. Such protest will hurt sentiments of many individual. If government agrees to these demands unopposed than unfair treatment of minorities will continue. Hence, overall to bring good to the society, it is required to do right thing than the most demanded thing. Above two examples illustrate this point.
However, I do concede that in extreme cases serving to public will is necessary. For instance, when elected government or official is bigoted than he will lack the ability to maintain disinterestedness while making any policy. Assume that government introduces a new tax system which indirectly benefits opulent. Protest from public will remind them of their wrongdoing and to remain impartial. This also encourages government to compromise their views and accept public opinion. Hence, under such situations citizen's demand forces officials to stand constantly for good.
Overall, I mostly agree that officials or government should stand firm on their decisions because of above mentioned reasons. Also, a person who keep changing his stand just to appease public also lacks credibility. In long term people prefer those who has definite value or moral. History has shown us many such examples and people revere them till today. However, I do concede that society should be attentive enough to curb government's misconduct.
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 54
- People s behaviour is largely determined by forces not of their own making 58
- People s behaviour is largely determined by forces not of their own making 58
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 62
- It is primarily in cities that a nation s cultural traditions are generated and preserved 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 265, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: will
...ther side. Hence, serving as per public will will be detrimental. For example, if governm...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 505, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...e to their kids and affect their rights in future. Such protest will hurt sentiments of m...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 553, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun individual seems to be countable; consider using: 'many individuals'.
Suggestion: many individuals
...e. Such protest will hurt sentiments of many individual. If government agrees to these demands ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 570, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ill hurt sentiments of many individual. If government agrees to these demands unop...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, well, while, for example, for instance, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 58.6224719101 113% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2760.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 504.0 442.535393258 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47619047619 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73813722054 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88965191389 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.537698412698 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 852.3 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.7293195274 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0322580645 118.986275619 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2580645161 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77419354839 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279107498001 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0695870852896 0.0831039109588 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0469720022623 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162427627904 0.150359130593 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346411163076 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 12.1639044944 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.