Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
No one can gainsay that the government should make a timely and wiseful decision on national and international issues in order to promote the development of the country. Indisputably, some individuals are in the oppionion that the authority should determine those decisions regardless of the opionion of public to create efficient policy-making. However, not everyone agrees on such perspectives. There are some cases that a leadership that cares for opinions of his or her people successfully makes inclusive, satisfactory choices but also lowers the corruption potential of the government.
First and foremost, there are certainly benefits of authoritarian leadership. This is mainly due to the fact that if the government make their own decisions, these can be time-efficient. In fact, it takes a considerable amount of time to reach the agreement of a matter from all various kinds of people with different interests. The autocratic government does not have to go thorugh the conversation with public, and they can also quickly decide a next step to take for a country. This is particularly effective when it comes to war or other emergency, as measures should be taken in no time. Similarly, authoritarian leadership can be helpful to enhance the national economy. This is because they can arbitrarily allocate various resources such as factory or human resources for the sake of their plan, which often brings off effective economic development. Therefore, the government can be highly efficient to make a timely decisions and good impacts on the country’s economy when they do not listen much on the public.
On the contrary, the democratic leadership who are deeply concerned with the people’s ideas and response can come up with a comprehensive policy that encompasses all different perspectives and ideas among people. Although it might take time to reach the consensus, it is surely beneficial to provide solutions to satisfy the greatest number of people. Furthermore, as people are more likely to get satiated by the decisions of the government, as their interests are considered, they build up a high level of repect and loyalty to their government. The more they feel satisfied toward the authority, the more they would relish satisfactory life, which can affect positively their quality of life and physical and phycological health. Hence, democratic style of government can benefit the general public and improve their life satisfaction.
In addition, when national leaders listen to the public, there are less possibility that they would commit unethical or immoral crimes. For instance, it such society, the government are more often than not engaged in public conversation and often scrutinized by the public and media. In this way, they are less likely to commit a crime such as bribery or embezzlement. Therefore, the democratic leadership can prevent the authority from perpetrating significant crimes and promote the integrity of a government.
To sum up, there is no denying the fact that the authoritarian leadership also has many merits such as efficient policy making or economic improvement etc. However, we should not neglect the fact that inclusive approach of a leadership in terms of making a national decision can improve the general traits of the public and their life style, but also democratic leaders can play a role to reduce the governmental serious crime. Therefore, we should aim to make democratic environment in the leadership to help people in the society feel happy and satisfied with their life and government but also to control the leadership’s corruption
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | Raian Islam | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | Harsha98 | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | shiki | 66 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | Gh.Ne | 66 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | isaackoshy | 33 | view |
- to understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 16
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagreewith the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. Indeveloping and supportin 66
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer-generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 66
- to understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In deve 16
- In any field of inquiry, the beginner is more likely than the expert to make important contributions.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. I 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 793, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...tic style of government can benefit the general public and improve their life satisfaction. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, similarly, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in fact, such as, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 70.0 58.6224719101 119% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3061.0 2235.4752809 137% => OK
No of words: 573.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34205933682 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89258810929 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11801192451 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 215.323595506 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462478184991 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 984.6 704.065955056 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1486678675 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.541666667 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.875 23.4991977007 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12981977765 0.243740707755 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0395575786637 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288736711049 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0766217257501 0.150359130593 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301767846275 0.0667264976115 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 142.0 100.480337079 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.