Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
While society keeps developing fast, officials’ will be not a secret in front of the people owing to the Internet. Also, their judgment becomes open and reachable to the public through all kinds of media. When should the officials carry out the decision on their own and when should they listen to the will of the public depend largely on their country’s institution feature and situation.
It is almost impossible for government officials to put forth people’s will without question it, although every official promise to follow and represent the people’s wish when election. The nature of the politic tolerant tricks in its arena where allow a politician to play in and out of the game. Also, the statement seems right when in an emergency, accepting people’s will and implement it will make the policy end up in confusion and chaos because too many individuals’ ideas come up based on their benefits. For example, when the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident happens, many residents did not want to leave home even exposed to the highly dangerous radioactivity. An adult stayed in his house because his dog lost, a school’s principal went back to school because he wanted to bring the medals which supposed to grant graduation student. In this situation, the governor’s chosen to ask residents to leave no matter in what situation and forced to implement as an order saved thousands of lives. Imagine if the governor did not order people to leave instead of schedule a meeting, and follow the each will of resident, such as, to get the medals back, or to find the pet dogs, and so on, the situation in Fukushima would be an even bigger disaster. Therefore, in an emergency, the officials should carry out the policy own their professional judgment.
While the governors can have the opportunity to put his will as a policy, listening to a person who can represent many people’ idea is significant. Those representatives are lawyers, professors, activists, doctors and so on because when the officials lost in the game of money and power in politic the game, the voice from society can put them back to their real mission from self-indulge. Without listening to the opinion from society, the official will lose his credit in front of the people to the point where threaten his long-term position. Take environmental problems, for example, if an official wants to build a dam in a community without listening to the residents’ opinion, the plan will fail eventually. Even he successfully with his own will, he will lose his power because of the continuing protest from residents. Therefore, the policy should be carried out base on the public or show public opinions.
However, in the situation that the dictatorship’s country, it still happens many cases that the ruler set the policy without knowing the people’s wish. This kind of condition is many other countries and international NGO trying to help to inspire those local people because the rule will not keep his power forever and take advantage of their people in a civilized society.
To sum up, in an emergency when people lost their judgment, the officials should need to help their people to make the right decision. In another situation, before implementing the policy, the official should listen to people’s idea first.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | Raian Islam | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | Harsha98 | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | shiki | 66 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | Gh.Ne | 66 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | isaackoshy | 33 | view |
- Claim Though often considered an objective pursuit learning about the historical past requires creativity Reason Because we can never know the past directly we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts documents and artifacts 77
- When XYZ lays off employees it pays Delany Personnel Firm to offer those employees assistance in creating r sum s and developing interviewing skills if they so desire Laid off employees have benefited greatly from Delany s services last year those who use 79
- Claim: Governments must ensure that their major cities receive the financial support they need in order to thrive.Reason: It is primarily in cities that a nation's cultural traditions are preserved and generated.Write a response in which you discuss 50
- Issue TopicClaim: Restaurants should be required to display nutritional information about the food they serve.Reason: This knowledge will help diners make healthy choices and reduce their risk of diet-related health problems. 66
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoni 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1144, Rule ID: MODAL_OF[2]
Message: It's never correct to use "of" after a modal verb. Use 'will have'.
Suggestion: will have
...schedule a meeting, and follow the each will of resident, such as, to get the medals ba...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, still, therefore, while, for example, kind of, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 23.0 12.4196629213 185% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2814.0 2235.4752809 126% => OK
No of words: 551.0 442.535393258 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10707803993 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.84493438435 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98077453823 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49001814882 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 865.8 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2302207647 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2380952381 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.52380952381 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187934518632 0.243740707755 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687784988716 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564844228192 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129082660971 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443991014327 0.0667264976115 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.