1. Government officials should rely on their judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The author asserts that the governors should merely decide according to their judgment instead of caring about the people's requirement. This is the claim with which I generally do not concur. Among the countless reasons which give adherence to my standpoint, I will delve into the most conspicuous ones in the following paragraphs.
The first striking fact which should be considered is the main responsibility of government is servicing people. In fact, the initial and vital rule of a governor is providing the adequate and appealing services, as the governor, in the modern democratic society, is by the people, of the people, and for the people there is the obligation of consideration of people's wishes. Otherwise, the decision made by the governor would be one-directional and solid one which does not match the majority's requirement. According to the noteworthy, intelligence study conducted by the Sociology Department in Tehran University, the outcome of the decision, which is made by the ignorance of the citizens' willing, has the possibility of pleading the people by is less than the twenty percent. This numeric value shows the importance of consideration of the people's wish during the decision making by the leader in pleasing society.
Another equally crucial point which should be high lightened is the relying solely on own judgment by the leader causes corruption or failures in the government system. In fact, the human being by the egocentric attitude is more inclined to do mistake and error; as the mankind considers himself as the center of the universe, the feasibility of making the selfish decision with denying the majority's benefit rises. This fact applies to the government system too; because as the governor considers himself as the right and justice of the society, he is prone to making the hazardous and selfish decision increases. A lucid example of this fact, which shed the spotlight on the issue, the war between Iran and Iraq. During that period if a nationwide survey was conducted by both leaders of Iraq and Iran whether to declare the war or not, both sides would have sustained billions of losses. However, both sides for the sake of their ego continued to battle for eight years.
However, some people claim that according to the variety of denizens and their wishes, it is impossible to satisfy the entire people. This group actually does underestimate a very subtle point which, the benchmark of satisfaction id the majority, not the whole people. Indeed, the government or the mayor does elect by the majority of people, not the entire citizens; in this case, the milestone is the gladness of those voted.
To wrap it up, all the aforementioned reasons and examples explicitly depict the importance of people's willing during the decision making by the governor. As mentioned, since the governor worked for people and there is the possibility of corruption by selfish decision making, the consideration of majorities' wish is necessary.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-15 | Raian Islam | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-26 | Harsha98 | 50 | view |
| 2019-08-20 | shiki | 66 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | Gh.Ne | 66 | view |
| 2019-06-20 | isaackoshy | 33 | view |
- The following appeared as part of an article in a business magazine."A recent study rating 300 male and female advertising executives according to the average number of hours they sleep per night showed an association between the amount of sleep the execu 55
- 1.Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In develo 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? the ability to maintain a friendship with a small number of people over a long period is more important for happiness than the ability to make many new friends easily. 73
- Claim: Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Reason: It is inappropriate — and, perhaps, even cruel — to use public resources to fund the arts when people's basi 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Improving schools is the most important factor in the successful development of a country. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 116, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...ir judgment instead of caring about the peoples requirement. This is the claim with whi...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, however, if, may, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2514.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 487.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16221765914 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8515106973 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486652977413 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 792.0 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 10.0 4.38483146067 228% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.5583095655 60.3974514979 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.315789474 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6315789474 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42105263158 5.21951772744 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162609189136 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552940738116 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404507427581 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0953583653682 0.150359130593 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415003009134 0.0667264976115 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 14.1392134831 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 138.0 100.480337079 137% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.