Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As some people may hold the view that there is no side-effect of directed the advertising toward the children; however, others may take an opposite viewpoint and believe that there should be a restriction for this kind of advertisement. I personally agree with the second belief. In the following paragraphs, I will delve into the most outstanding reasons which persuade me to put forward this perspective.
The first exquisite reason which gives adherence to my outlook is that the children do not have the comprehensive cognition. It is lucidly obvious that a child in the age of 4 cannot distinguish between two options of bad and good. In this case, with this disability, he or she cannot easily clear the substance which is appropriate for her or him. On the other hand, the commercial companies do not care about the quality of materials which they advertise, and in most of the cases they use the fake slogan to attract their consumers' attitude. Thus, the children can impel by the products which are not suitable for his or her age. As a result, in this conflicted condition, the wise decision can be the ban of commercial for the kids.
The second case embraced my idea is that the children do have an unsatisfied appetite. The majority of the kids will the substances without the consideration of their accurate and real capacity or their families' responsibilities for these demands. Consequently, there is conflict among the kids' requirement and their families' accountabilities. Accord to the noteworthy, intelligent survey conducted in my country, approximately sixty-nine percent of the children aged between two to five, acquire the subjects beyond their families' capabilities and they cannot prepare them. This condition paves the path to the argument or disobedience of the children. However, if the fancy advertisements were limited, the children will not acquire the expensive subjects.
The last indicator of my viewpoint's accuracy is that these commercials contain the hidden immoral message which affects the children's behaviors indirectly. It is eloquently explicit that there are the lots aggressive, or immoral messages in the current television shows and the advertisement is not exceptional from this fact. Besides, the fact that the children are a decent imitator should not be the underestimate. As a result, the kids learn and repeat all negative messages from the advertisement. A vivid example can be given to shed the light on the subjects is my nephew's example. He is 4 years old, and he is so clever; however, he influenced so fast by the surrounding. A few months ago he saw an inappropriate scene in the television and he started to try that scene in his social communications, which was an impolite action. Thus, my sister bans the television to prevent this kind of mistakes, and after a while, he forgot that amoral action.
To wrap it up, based on the all aforementioned reasons, one can logically draw the conclusion that the advertisement is not suitable for the children. Since they do not have the holistic perception, their desires do not end, and the commercial delivers immoral messages which they cannot handle.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-19 | Umesh Raja | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Umesh Raja | 75 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Umesh Raja | 75 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Umesh Raja | 60 | view |
| 2019-06-23 | Banga0915 | 78 | view |
- . Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In the past young people depended on their parents for making decisions. Today, young people are better able to make decisions on their own. 70
- 9.The following appeared in a health newsletter."A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that num 46
- Claim: The surest indicator of a great nation is not the achievements of its rulers, artists, or scientists.Reason: The surest indicator of a great nation is actually the welfare of all its people.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which 79
- In this age of intensive media coverage, it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for t 40
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 51, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[14]
Message: Did you mean 'side effect' (=adverse effect, unintended consequence)? Open compounds are not hyphenated.
Suggestion: side effect
...ople may hold the view that there is no side-effect of directed the advertising toward the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 291, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'kids'' or 'kid's'?
Suggestion: kids'; kid's
...nsequently, there is conflict among the kids requirement and their families accounta...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'consequently', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'kind of', 'as a result', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.212435233161 0.229887763892 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.120898100173 0.158761421928 76% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0898100172712 0.0866891130778 104% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0535405872193 0.046263068375 116% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0639032815199 0.0685040099705 93% => OK
Prepositions: 0.108808290155 0.118717715034 92% => OK
Participles: 0.0103626943005 0.0351676179071 29% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 3.07393123775 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0172711571675 0.0309702414327 56% => OK
Particles: 0.00172711571675 0.00188951952338 91% => OK
Determiners: 0.148531951641 0.0887237588012 167% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0259067357513 0.0209618222197 124% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.013816925734 0.0139019557991 99% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3170.0 2387.08602151 133% => OK
No of words: 520.0 408.028673835 127% => OK
Chars per words: 6.09615384615 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77530192783 4.48200974243 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.344230769231 0.338922669872 102% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.294230769231 0.251872472559 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.226923076923 0.174417080927 130% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.144230769231 0.112833075102 128% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07393123775 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 264.0 212.727598566 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507692307692 0.524397521467 97% => OK
Word variations: 60.7684457412 59.2087087015 103% => OK
How many sentences: 25.0 20.6684587814 121% => OK
Sentence length: 20.8 20.5533526081 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7313342416 48.84282405 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.8 120.699889404 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.5533526081 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.56 0.644075263715 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.5376344086 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 50.2230769231 45.7405998639 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.39130434783 1.45489161554 96% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265820261882 0.300154397459 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0962238267984 0.103427244359 93% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0607285106139 0.0752933317313 81% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.570043216656 0.497263757937 115% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.113141162694 0.151897553556 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112483153292 0.114077575197 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420832324605 0.0781384742642 54% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.53427506276 0.336927656856 159% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0741110367047 0.067059652881 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196590320378 0.210909579961 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0124646142452 0.0618886996521 20% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 11.8870967742 42% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 16.0 3.86379928315 414% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.91756272401 81% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 8.42114695341 47% => OK
Negative topic words: 12.0 2.4623655914 487% => Less negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.75985663082 109% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.6433691756 139% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.