Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.

<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Many people believe that television advertising directed towards the young children should be allowed. For me, although there are many benefits for not allowing such advertisement; there are many cases in which its good to allow. In this essay, i'll address some problems associated with denial of such permission.
First of all, the products advertised on televesion can help to increase children's creativity. I have witnessed it in my personal life. My 4 years old niece was watching televsion where found a drawing book. Afterwards, she asked my sisters to buy one for her. When my sister brought that to home, I was surprised to see different levels of drawing in one book. For the first level it required just colour filling and at top level, the children had to imitate a given model. As a result of completing that drawing book, my niece has improved her modeling skills in very early age. Therefore, we can see how an advertisement can improve children's intellectual power.
Secondly, participation of other children in televsion advertisements can improve lifestyle of children. Few examples to consider are ways of dressing and speaking. When I was a child, I had observed my friends improving their physical appearance by observing other children in advertisements. At that time, a child named John was shown on television for advertisement of an ice cream. The child used to wear a leather jacket in that ad. When my friend observed him, he bought one for himself and it did suite on him quite well. Additionally, he learned some English words from those ads. Consequently, such advertisements improved his daily lifestyle.
What is half full to some may appeal half empty to others. Similarly, many people may feel that TV advertisements may make some children obstinate for getting things right away. But this does not appeal to me because people (and hence the children) learn from their own mistakes. At one time, if a child gets some product and later on they don't like it, they can easily exclude such items from their choice. It have seen such behavior in my nephew. He purchased a video game after watching an advertisement on TV. Later on, he came to know that the game had not that many features as advertised. Therefore, now he asks others as well before buying something.
Putting all my discussion together lead me to believe that TV ads for young children should be permitted. As I have mentioned my analysis that it can improve their creativity, lifestlye and decision making power.</span><br>

Votes
Average: 7.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-08-19 Umesh Raja 73 view
2019-08-18 Umesh Raja 75 view
2019-08-18 Umesh Raja 75 view
2019-08-18 Umesh Raja 60 view
2019-06-23 Banga0915 78 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Umesh Raja :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 338, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ild gets some product and later on they dont like it, they can easily exclude such i...
^^^^
Line 4, column 409, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'has'?
Suggestion: has
...xclude such items from their choice. It have seen such behavior in my nephew. He pur...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, well, as a result, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 15.1003584229 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 13.8261648746 51% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 57.0 43.0788530466 132% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.0752688172 74% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2141.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 425.0 407.700716846 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03764705882 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54043259262 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08081326611 2.67179642975 115% => OK
Unique words: 249.0 212.727598566 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585882352941 0.524837075471 112% => OK
syllable_count: 658.8 618.680645161 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.51792114695 199% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 29.0 20.6003584229 141% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.1344086022 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.4585352452 48.9658058833 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.8275862069 100.406767564 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.6551724138 20.6045352989 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.03448275862 5.45110844103 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.5376344086 36% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.88709677419 246% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120981197716 0.236089414692 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319275629234 0.076458572812 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487257225359 0.0737576698707 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.076937779923 0.150856017488 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391853793025 0.0645574589148 61% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 11.7677419355 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 58.1214874552 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 10.1575268817 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.36 10.9000537634 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.01818996416 98% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.002688172 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.0537634409 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.