Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
I tend to agree with the statement that advertising aimed at young children should not be allowed.
First, this action is innapropriate on moral grounds. Think about the nature of advertising: to convince, or, to put it more bluntly, to manipulate, people’s beliefs and behaviors. When advertising is toward an adult who has been educated and informed, its impacts are less devastating and disturbing. However, when advertising is directed toward a child aged two to five, who possesses almost no critical thinking skills, its effects are immediate, undesirable, and disastrous. Take the example of my little cousin, who had actually eight years when she saw in the television a prohibitive medicine claiming that it would heighten the users’ heights (she was the shortest among her classmates). If it had been for my aunt, she actually would have ordered the item without hesitation. Then who could have immagined the side-effects of the medicine? Advertising toward children is not only immoral but also irresponsable.
Second, this deed would influence children negatively. If you were to ask a random person what phrase is most important for a person, he or she would probably say :“When you are young.” Indeed, the informative years are possibly the most important years for any person considering the fact that most perceptions that people have were formed during these years. Yet if we allowed children who are just developing fundamental conceptions about the world to be spoiled by advertising, what would happen to these children? Their values would be distorted, their perceptions would be erratic, and their future would be compromised.
Now, some might argue that by allowing children to be influenced by advertising, we actually give them the possibility to satisfy their nature needs. However, it is inappropriate to conclude that children really know what they want if they are not armed with the necessary thinking skills. Thus, such a view is misleading at best.
In sum, we should not allow advertising to be directed at children aged two to five.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-19 | Umesh Raja | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Umesh Raja | 75 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Umesh Raja | 75 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | Umesh Raja | 60 | view |
| 2019-06-23 | Banga0915 | 78 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statementsometimes people think nowadays the media TV newspaper internet is less concerned about the accuracy of news than in the past, and the incorrect information may cause more problems to the public. 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Television advertising directed toward young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... that most perceptions that people have were formed during these years. Yet if we al...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, however, if, really, second, so, then, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 15.1003584229 166% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 13.8261648746 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.0286738351 136% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 43.0788530466 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 52.1666666667 69% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1757.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 334.0 407.700716846 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26047904192 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.48103885553 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99562980242 2.67179642975 112% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583832335329 0.524837075471 111% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.51792114695 142% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6003584229 83% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.513884257 48.9658058833 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.352941176 100.406767564 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6470588235 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.17647058824 5.45110844103 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228414477822 0.236089414692 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0787142686681 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101297657937 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184516797763 0.150856017488 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12135299063 0.0645574589148 188% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 11.7677419355 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 10.9000537634 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.01818996416 107% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 86.8835125448 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.