government should not fund any scientific researches whose consequences are unclear
Humans are considered to be the superior beings in the planet in comparison with other creatures in the form of intelligence and thinking capabilities. Like every organism which have its counter pair, humans also have one for continuing life optimally. To be straight both men and women are equally considered in the societies despite their physical differences. I strongly disagree with the statement, because in today's world people of both the respective genders are treated equal, they are employed in diverse fields, where they are excelling equally irrespective of the gender. Here I provide a couple of reasons for disagreeing with the given statement.
Firstly, while going back to the stone ages, where the early man lived. Those male creatures of the clan or family were robust and strong, were given a designated job like foraging in the forest for food. In the meantime, the women at the huts were kept for maintaining the family and preparing food. But, today's age is drastically different where both persons in the house have certain equal roles. Especially, now women tend to supersede men from many jobs, which were actually thought to be meant for men only. For instance, Kalpana Chawla was the first woman to space. She was mocked and demotivated by many because of her gender. Despite all this drama, she succeeded. Although women body features are not as strong as men, they have determination and skill set to achieve the given task. Strength alone can't decide a person for a job.
Secondly, women are dominating in every field equally and in some cases more than men. Even the army has women paratroopers, battalions, etc, In the sports field, they show their irrefutable prowess. As the effect of women empowerment, many girls got a good education and now they are brilliantly ruling powerful nations. Moreover, there is no such task particularly meant for a gender. For example, men even do jobs like cooking, baking, etc. while their wives on the contrary will be a cop or in the military. Thus we should be clear in a point where gender is no matter for performing a job.
Finally, to sum up, all there are also really some heavy-duty tasks which ultimately can't be performed by women. Apart from that, both people are equal despite their physical differences. Both should respect and value each other so that a family will perish.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-03 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2024-03-29 | shahajan999 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-22 | raghavchauhan619 | 83 | view |
| 2023-10-20 | Juhong Park | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | georgez | 58 | view |
- technology development is good or bad 16
- Teaching of Good manners only enough for students to lead a good life 50
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings 50
- government should not fund any scientific researches whose consequences are unclear 50
- government should not fund any scientific researches whose consequences are unclear 16
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 810, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... achieve the given task. Strength alone cant decide a person for a job. Secondl...
^^^^
Line 9, column 513, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...trary will be a cop or in the military. Thus we should be clear in a point where gen...
^^^^
Line 13, column 86, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... some heavy-duty tasks which ultimately cant be performed by women. Apart from that,...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, moreover, really, second, secondly, so, thus, while, apart from, for example, for instance, in some cases, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96733668342 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61667223039 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 215.323595506 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570351758794 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 704.065955056 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.7504225142 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.08 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.92 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.32 5.21951772744 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0124060387755 0.243740707755 5% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00421519002094 0.0831039109588 5% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0143307713802 0.0758088955206 19% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0112514910014 0.150359130593 7% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0119852583374 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 14.1392134831 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.