Government should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
These days, scientific research and developments in many fields are accelerated by government and industry funding. However, if anyone doesn’t care whatever the research is going on, we can’t predict whether the research will affect us in a good way or a bad way. To reduce this predictable problem, I think the government should place a few restrictions on scientific research and development. I will suggest main two reasons why the government should watch this research.
First, if there is no limitation, some research can be dangerous to the public. Let’s imagine there is research for experiments about nuclear physics. If a government doesn’t restrict safety policies for the experiment, it may cause radiation leaks. It will increase any danger not only community near the experiments conducted but also to the cost of solving those problems. If the government restricts such experiments for safety purposes, damages and cost of restorations will not be increased. In the case of this example, restrictions mean saving our lives and wealth. To diminish any hazards from scientific research, any restrictions related to public safety must be a prerequisite.
Secondly, some scientific topics are very sensitive for nations where the government consists in. Science has no nationality but a scientist who conducts scientific research has. For instance, these days, semiconductors are very important to many countries. It is widely used in various applications so many industries and nations are depending on this technology. Because of this reason, they recognize those technologies are their strategic resources. Therefore, the government should consider keeping its intellectuals in control.
Conclusively, the restriction is important to keep scientific knowledge. Indeed, creativity is also important to developing science. However, the restriction does not limit scientists’ sight of views but tries to encourage scientists along with public worth. If any scientific research causes destructive results to its community, the scientist may feel frustrated. So, the government should place at least any restrictions on scientific research and development to save the worth of all people.
- Government should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 83
- Government should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 50
- Unfortunately in contemporary society creating an appealing image has become more important than the reality or truth behind that image Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 83
- People attend college or university for many different reasons for example new experiences career preparation increased knowledge Why do you think people attend college or university Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ications so many industries and nations are depending on this technology. Because of this rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, at least, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 332.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66265060241 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19102020644 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581325301205 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2349041366 60.3974514979 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.4545454545 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0909090909 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.512543770862 0.243740707755 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139567177392 0.0831039109588 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138585467058 0.0758088955206 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305837349701 0.150359130593 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124692519206 0.0667264976115 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...ications so many industries and nations are depending on this technology. Because of this rea...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, at least, for instance, i think
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 11.3162921348 18% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1880.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 332.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.66265060241 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19102020644 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.581325301205 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.2349041366 60.3974514979 40% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 85.4545454545 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.0909090909 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.54545454545 5.21951772744 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.512543770862 0.243740707755 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139567177392 0.0831039109588 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138585467058 0.0758088955206 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305837349701 0.150359130593 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124692519206 0.0667264976115 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.96 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.