Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
There are two types of problems which should be solved by government. One is which required immediate attentions other one is that which can wait or there possibilities that may happen in future. However, if government focuses on solving immediate problems then it is beneficial to society rather than solving problems which may anticipate in future.
There are many immediate problems which may require to solve as soon as possible. If immediate problems are solve first then they may help or reduced chances of other problems to occur in future. But if we don't solve problems which required immediate attention they these problems may increase. For example, Poverty, unemployment, better education, security etc. are immediate problems. If we do not give attention to this problems then situation get worse and more serious problems may increase. Thus, immediate problems should be first priority of government.
There are problems which may solve before it occurs in near future. Government should make a plan to face problems which may or may not occur. For example, government should ready for cyclone which may destroy many parts of city. If they do not make any plan to rescue people which are trapped then people will have to suffer. Thus, sometimes government has to make plans to solve problems otherwise people will have to suffer.
However, government should make a priority list of immediate problems as well as problems which may occur in future. Government's work is to solve problems of people of their city. Solving future problems while ignoring immediate will work against government. For example, If government failed to provide security but they there are planning to make gardens is baseless. So, government should solve immediate problems more than other problems.
In conclusion, there are some problems which required immediate attention and some problems which may or may not occurs in future but very serious problems then government should also make plans to solve them if they occur.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Himanshu Sharma | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | PFF TAHSAN | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | tg763622253 | 58 | view |
| 2019-12-06 | sudesh tiwari | 58 | view |
- According to a recent report, cheating among college and university students is on the rise. However, Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code, which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic en 23
- “Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment.” 50
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future. 50
- The following is a recommendation from the personnel director to the president of Acme Publishing Company."Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy Read Speed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One 50
- Government should provide the poor and the homeless with houses 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
... or there possibilities that may happen in future. However, if government focuses on solv...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 341, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...n solving problems which may anticipate in future. There are many immediate problems ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 54, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'solving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: solving
...ny immediate problems which may require to solve as soon as possible. If immediate probl...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'solved'.
Suggestion: solved
... as possible. If immediate problems are solve first then they may help or reduced cha...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 187, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...uced chances of other problems to occur in future. But if we dont solve problems which re...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... problems to occur in future. But if we dont solve problems which required immediate...
^^^^
Line 5, column 232, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e which may destroy many parts of city. If they do not make any plan to rescue peo...
^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ems as well as problems which may occur in future. Governments work is to solve problems ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, while, as to, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 24.0 12.4196629213 193% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 33.0505617978 45% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1706.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 324.0 442.535393258 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26543209877 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59591204309 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 215.323595506 58% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.382716049383 0.4932671777 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 529.2 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6394178402 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.2380952381 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.4285714286 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2380952381 5.21951772744 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 10.2758426966 19% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 18.0 5.13820224719 350% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.487285181924 0.243740707755 200% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215750034026 0.0831039109588 260% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147822837816 0.0758088955206 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.359822408944 0.150359130593 239% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106100077081 0.0667264976115 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.67 8.38706741573 80% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 100.480337079 47% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.