Some people believe it is often necessary, even desirable, for political leaders to withhold information from the public. Others believe that the public has a right to be fully informed.
Political leaders are an important people for a country. They have a power to make decision for country’s benefits. They set an example for their nation. They have all the sensitive information about their nation. They work for people so people should know all the information. However, leader should withhold information from public or people have right to know all the information is complicated issue.
People have right to be informed about their own nations. Most of the world has democratic countries where people elect their leaders. If leaders withhold information from people then it is harmful for leader. They lose trust from people. Also revealing information brings transparency. People believe in their leaders and work for their leaders which are beneficial for government. And transparency brings corruption less government. For example, if government provides details of their funds, where they used and how much they used, then people will satisfy that there money used for betterment of nation. So, Leader should informed people to bring transparency.
In contrast, there are some details which are very important and crucial for government to reveal. They may raise threat to nation and it cannot share with people like information about security, defense, internal government documents and details about potential threat to country’s integrity. These details should withhold from people for their safety. For example, if details about boarder security somehow reach to other country, then there will be big problems at border and lives of soldiers are in danger. Thus, political leader should not reveal sensitive details about nation to people.
However, people have right to informed and also understand which details they should know. Details about security of country or defense are very sensitive and therefore people should understand that these details are dangerous if revealed publicly. And it is duty of leader what to reveal to people and what not to. So, some details are necessary to withhold from people but there are other details that people should be rightfully informed.
In conclusion, political leader is a very important person and they should know what details should reveal to people and what not to. Letting the information known to the public will create mutual understanding between the leaders and the people and it will give great success.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-26 | hyein | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | jason123 | 62 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | jason123 | 62 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | Roshan Dhakal | 50 | view |
| 2019-10-26 | christine_cui | 75 | view |
- Integrated WritingIn the United States, employees typically work five days a week for eight hours each day. However, many employees want to work a four-day week and are willing to accept less pay in order to do so. A mandatory policy requiring companies 85
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager."One month ago, all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one 29
- should college be free for everyone? 70
- People do many different things to stay healthy. What do you do for good health? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- The following is a letter that recently appeared in the Oak City Gazette, a local newspaper."The primary function of the Committee for a Better Oak City is to advise the city government on how to make the best use of the city's limited budget. However, at 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 161, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
.... They set an example for their nation. They have all the sensitive information abou...
^^^^
Line 1, column 221, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...nsitive information about their nation. They work for people so people should know a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...or leader. They lose trust from people. Also revealing information brings transparen...
^^^^
Line 9, column 280, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... people and it will give great success.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, for example, in conclusion, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2041.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 377.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41379310345 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62616884453 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.411140583554 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 605.7 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0276213717 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.5 118.986275619 66% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5 23.4991977007 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.65384615385 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.83258426966 290% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302077258921 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10696724569 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0838253865326 0.0758088955206 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188942067005 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430218366729 0.0667264976115 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 14.1392134831 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.