Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future
The development of a country is dependent on how efficiently the government is making decision and tackling the problem. In most of the states of the world, ruling political party is elected by the people of the country through voting. Generally, the people elect the party which precisely concern about the problems of the society. So, I mostly agree with the statement that government should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
First of all, the success of a government is relied on the how efficiently it can meet the needs of the public and solve the ongoing problems. If the government don’t focus on the ongoing problems, a rage against the government will rise in the people and gradually they will start to lose trust from the government. As a result, government can not successfully run it’s long term projects to solve the anticipated problems. For example, Bangladesh is low income developing country and people here are suffering from malnutrition, unemployment, unhygienic water. Government should focus on solving these immediate fundamental problems of the country. Unfortunately, Bangladesh govt. is more concerned with unnecessary infrastructural such as construction of excess express way, flyover due to their own purpose rather than for the sake of the people. Consequently, people lost their trust from the government which causes an unstable situation in the country hampering the economical development of the country. From this phenomenon is is lucid that the government should give priority to the immediate basic problems rather than long term anticipated problems.
Secondly, government should not spend much more time money behind the anticipated problems because they may get changed with the passage of time. The plans or solutions that are granted by the government may not work perfectly. For example, Bangladesh government has spent a huge amount of money on launching its first satellite Bangabandhu satellite while the people of the country are dying for the lack of lawful justices . But, after a year of launching govt. make only a few deals for utilizing the satellite and giving services which indicates that this satellite became an white elephant of the country.
Finally, the government should take strong long term plans to alleviate the ongoing problems forever not the anticipated one. However, anticipated problems such as environment pollution, green house effect should be considered seriously but not more than the ongoing problems. Furthermore, Govt. should take balanced steps to solve both the immediate and anticipated problems so that next generation can have a good future .
In summary, from the above analysis and examples it is completely unambiguous that Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
- Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals 50
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 50
- Despite its downtown location the Rialto Movie Theater a local institution for five decades must make big changes or close its doors forever It should follow the example of the new Apex Theater in the mall outside of town When the Apex opened last year it 53
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places 54
- People who are the most deeply committed to an idea or policy are also the most critical of it 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 56, Rule ID: THE_HOW[1]
Message: Did you mean 'how'?
Suggestion: how
...he success of a government is relied on the how efficiently it can meet the needs of th...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 985, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... situation in the country hampering the economical development of the country. From this p...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1045, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: is
...nt of the country. From this phenomenon is is lucid that the government should give p...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 425, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re dying for the lack of lawful justices . But, after a year of launching govt. m...
^^
Line 7, column 426, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e dying for the lack of lawful justices . But, after a year of launching govt. ma...
^^
Line 7, column 579, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ch indicates that this satellite became an white elephant of the country. Fin...
^^
Line 10, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...leviate the ongoing problems forever not the anticipated one. However, anticipate...
^^
Line 10, column 424, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t next generation can have a good future . In summary, from the above analysis...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in summary, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 12.9106741573 178% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2503.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 463.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4060475162 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.63868890866 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92229025277 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 216.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466522678186 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 764.1 704.065955056 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.4940057084 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.772727273 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0454545455 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.548549928997 0.243740707755 225% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162583399812 0.0831039109588 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.205249987689 0.0758088955206 271% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.384515294972 0.150359130593 256% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.191612958711 0.0667264976115 287% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.