Claim: The best way to understand the character of a society is to examine the character of the men and women that the society chooses as its heroes or its role models.
Reason: Heroes and role models reveal a society's highest ideals
Society is a term which means the collection of people where everyone is inter-related and inter-connected. That’s why characteristics of the society reflect the customs, moral values and life-style of the people. In the statement author claimed that only some heroes or role models can represent the total characteristics of the society which is unambiguously unreasonable.
First of all, in every states there are people from different regions and each region has some distinct cultural and social trends. A hero or a role model will not be able to convey the characteristics that are from different parts of the states. Rather he will exhibit the characteristics of the region where he was grown up. For example, India is one of the largest countries of the world and the characteristics of the different regions differ largely from one another such as most of the inhabitants of Kolkata are illiterate and farmers where the inhabitants of the capital Delhi are more advanced. So, a role model from the Delhi can’t represent the whole nation because there are many differences in visions, obstacles and achievement among the people of the different regions.
Secondly, role model is a person who is more developed, advanced in his thinking, achievement from other denizens of the society. That’s why rest of the people of the society follow him which indicates that there is a lucid gap between them and the role model. Hence, the role model can’t represent the whole society. For example, Kazi Nazrul Islam is national poet of Bangladesh and a role model of the nation. In his contents, he tried to make people aware of the corruption and he was also against the dogmatic religious believes but it is sad that most of the people of the country rear values that are completely contradictory.
Finally, the characteristics of the society don’t remain steady rather they are dynamic and change with passage of time. As a result, the role model can’t reflect the characteristics of the society forever. For example, Bangabondhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman who is considered as the father of the nation, always dreamed a country where people of all professions, religions will have equal rights for which he dedicated his life. But it is sad that after his death the whole nation get changed which causes severe discriminations to the minorities and poor people of the society.
In summary, from the above analysis and examples it is unambiguous that the characteristics of the society can’t be revealed only by examining the role models of the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-03 | Zahid6400 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | LauraTing | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | Isolus | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | wopona8219 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-05 | rickxiangx | 83 | view |
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individual 62
- Scandals are useful because they focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could 50
- Despite its downtown location the Rialto Movie Theater a local institution for five decades must make big changes or close its doors forever It should follow the example of the new Apex Theater in the mall outside of town When the Apex opened last year it 53
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
- Laws should be flexible enough to take account of various circumstances, times, and places 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...are from different parts of the states. Rather he will exhibit the characteristics of ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in summary, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2173.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13711583924 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03572795126 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.460992907801 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 701.1 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0324548104 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.722222222 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 5.21951772744 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182405302935 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0767265747875 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0711485702335 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133877153087 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.057547933608 0.0667264976115 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.