Scientific research requires a lot of money and hard work to achieve intended results. They are the backbone of economic and scientific growth of a country. These days every country is actively participating in scientific research with a zeal to reach apogee in that particular field. I moderately agree with the fact that government should not fund any scientific research whose consequences are unclear using three reasons. To understand this better one has to go through scrupulous discussion.
Firstly, food plays a major role and a basic necessity for any human being. For instance, when government funded the food projects like different hybrids of fruits and tree producing various results they produce a clear form of the intended results whether they are beneficial and important nutrients included in the coming product. It gives a clear picture of the way money is spent that benefits not only the country and even they could export them abroad if the results are fruitful. Even a small defect in the gene could cause negative effects so the consequences should always be kept in mind while doing the research.
In addition, to strengthen a country's military they build vast missiles and test them in places like desserts. If the after effects are not keenly observed then there could be chances of environment pollution and destruction because of the chemicals released once the blast is done. For instance, an incident occurred in Japan for which they are paying the price until now. A nuclear bomb blast caused enormous people suffer with disability and the gene are passed until generations. Such destructive blasts can happen if government funds research without valid proofs.
Lastly, there could be situations which are unpredictable. For instance, The corona situation which is still present from two years could not have been mitigated if government had not fund these researches irrespective of the results. The main aim is to achieve a vaccine but one cannot possibly identify all the side effects it can cause. In such situation neither government nor official could hinder the research. There will be side effects but they would try hard enough to undermine them. In this process many people have lost their life and money even though the results are unclear every one fought equally to make the situation better.
To conclude, everyone would argue that all the scientific researches should be funded irrespective of the consequences. If this process is administered any random person would file for a funding process and enjoy with the money provided and in turn show the results that it got failed due to particular reasons. As corruption is increasing at a rapid rate most of them would find a flaw in this and make it beneficial for their own results. So the plan, process, up to date information should always be shared with Government which is funding the scientific research.
- The following appeared in a letter to the school board in the town of Centerville All students should be required to take the driver s education course at Centerville High School In the past two years several accidents in and around Centerville have invol 50
- In business education and government it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust 58
- Eco certification and American wood companies Integrated Reading Section In an effort to encourage ecologically sustainable forestry practices an international organization started issuing certifications to wood companies that meet high ecological standar 80
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected However since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations we cannot permit i 70
- The best way to solve environmental problems caused by consumer generated waste is for towns and cities to impose strict limits on the amount of trash they will accept from each household Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 299, Rule ID: AGREE_WITH_THE_FACT[1]
Message: Use simply 'agree that'.
Suggestion: agree that
... in that particular field. I moderately agree with the fact that government should not fund any scientif...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 184, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'funded'.
Suggestion: funded
...ve been mitigated if government had not fund these researches irrespective of the re...
^^^^
Line 4, column 531, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...m. In this process many people have lost their life and money even though the res...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, so, still, then, while, as to, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2435.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 478.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09414225941 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67581127817 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67892645335 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 250.0 215.323595506 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523012552301 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 742.5 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.8975307978 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.458333333 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9166666667 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.70833333333 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208956789926 0.243740707755 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628597361627 0.0831039109588 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693928208723 0.0758088955206 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124235786461 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528167317561 0.0667264976115 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.