The author here posits that online degree programs will help Humana University increase it's total enrollment and solve it's budget problems. This is supported by the statement that there is a substantial increase in online degree enrollment in Omni University by 50% which in turn showed a significant decrease in expenditure for dormitory and class room space as most of the tutoring happens via internet. However, the argument can be considered veracious if the three questions are answered.
Firstly, the infrastructure data about the universities are not shared. What if the Humana University has huge buildings constructed all over the campus ? This would in turn demands for a amply number of workers to keep it tidy and also the surroundings need to be serene which would be crying out for more gardeners to keep it intact. Also the salaries have to be paid to the tutors if they employed the best they would have to pay handful to uphold them otherwise they would select an alternative with lucrative offer. If this is considered a fact then it would furthermore weaken the argument.
Secondly, the ranking of Humana University is not mentioned. Even if the university provides online classes what is the credence that students would register in this particular one ? There might be outstanding colleges out there offering copious online courses with the best tutors around the would. This would stymie the chances of students enrolling courses in Humana and opt for another colleges. There might be courses which students are in need of and popular in the booming market and absence of these courses in the curriculum. This when considered would undermine the argument.
Lastly, the fee for online courses are not considered. What if the Humana bestow courses which are costlier than other universities ? No one would choose a course with exorbitant prices while they are getting the best for a far less price. Many other universities are offering discounts and concessions for merit students and also for those below poverty line. This would never lead to hindrance of the budget and even more mitigate the chances in return leading to more budget deficit. If this taken into account would furthermore makes the argument fragile.
To conclude, the argument is flawed with various unwarranted assumptions. The argument can only be considered viable if author provides answers and more evidence to these misleading questions.
- Since its opening in Collegeville twenty years ago Monarch Books has developed a large customer base due to its reader friendly atmosphere and wide selection of books on all subjects Last month Book and Bean a combination bookstore and coffee shop announc 63
- It is easier for parents to raise children now than 50 years ago 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Nowadays more and more people spend too much money on their pets dogs cats and others although there are better uses for this money 73
- Playing computer games is a waste of time Children should not be allowed to play them 90
- Some people believe that the most effective means of advancing the development of a society is by focusing on the contributions resulting from the goals of each individual Others believe that goals pertaining to the whole society provide a necessary unify 58
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 13 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 5 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 395 350
No. of Characters: 2005 1500
No. of Different Words: 201 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.458 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.076 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.637 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 150 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 109 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 80 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 47 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.955 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.123 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.636 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.293 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.293 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.07 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 1 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...campus ? This would in turn demands for a amply number of workers to keep it tidy...
^
Line 2, column 186, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('amply') instead an adjective, or a noun ('number') instead of another adjective.
...campus ? This would in turn demands for a amply number of workers to keep it tidy and also the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t for more gardeners to keep it intact. If this is considered a fact then it would...
^^
Line 4, column 366, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... return leading to more budget deficit. If this taken into account would furthermo...
^^
Line 4, column 411, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
...is taken into account would furthermore makes the argument fragile. To conclude, the...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.6327345309 81% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.9520958084 116% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 11.1786427146 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 28.8173652695 62% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 55.5748502994 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 16.3942115768 73% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1673.0 2260.96107784 74% => OK
No of words: 320.0 441.139720559 73% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.228125 5.12650576532 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.56307096286 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75987394938 2.78398813304 99% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 204.123752495 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534375 0.468620217663 114% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 705.55239521 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.96107784431 101% => OK
Article: 7.0 8.76447105788 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.67365269461 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.22255489022 24% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 19.7664670659 96% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.6124035068 57.8364921388 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.0526315789 119.503703932 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.8421052632 23.324526521 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.68421052632 5.70786347227 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 6.88822355289 102% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150879099528 0.218282227539 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462071509322 0.0743258471296 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0686265399554 0.0701772020484 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0891535714832 0.128457276422 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931222396723 0.0628817314937 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.3799401198 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 48.3550499002 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.197005988 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.5979740519 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.32208582834 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 98.500998004 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 12.3882235529 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.