Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take

Essay topics:

Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.

Education plays a crucial role in shaping one’s future and presenting oneself to the real world. The policy made in the given argument states that free University education should be offered to any student admitted to a University who cannot afford the tuition fee, by the Government. I partially agree with this policy, however, even after allowing free education, it is student’s responsibility how well he or she understands its importance.
Assuming that the University grants free education to the student, how can one assure that the student would make utmost use of the resources made available to him? For instance, if a student is admitted to the University with free education, then he might just take the free resources for granted, say, he doesn’t necessarily study from the study materials provided to him, or doesn’t attend the lab regularly, as he knows he won’t be wasting any money since he has to pay nothing. This may show the fecklessness of the student towards offering the education free of cost. It is however necessary that the University Professor or Counsellor consider the background of the students, their financial condition, and their past records of academics before the consensus.
Apart from this, there are some enthusiasts who have keen interest in their fields and find opportunities to explore and study the world of their interests, may it be from the field of arts, humanities, history, or research or development, but they couldn’t afford due to their financial condition. Such students who have greater potential of excelling in their fields must be given free education, as it will give them a platform to explore the field and enhance their career. For example, if the coding geek who cannot afford to study at the University level, is granted free education, he will grab this opportunity and can therefore develop some new websites, games, applications related to business or healthcare which might help the society and the citizens, solving real world problems, etc. He would not only excel in his career but will also give the University a higher regard.
In crux, keeping both the scenarios in mind, the Government should grant free education to the students by perfectly evaluating their financial background, and who possess skills required for the academics and real-world, and who have keen interest in their field, who aspire to make a better change in future through their study and skills. Someone who cannot afford millions and doesn’t utilize the opportunity will however undermine the importance of education.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-10 guozhishan 58 view
2023-08-29 nigarsafarova 83 view
2023-08-24 Afolakemi 66 view
2023-07-09 ZHOU0444 83 view
2023-07-04 s.sim 62 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user anoushka1 :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, thus, well, after all, apart from, as to, for example, for instance

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2172.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1961722488 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79307936226 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523923444976 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 89.3321705008 60.3974514979 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 167.076923077 118.986275619 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1538461538 23.4991977007 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.21951772744 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27134023969 0.243740707755 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108993155047 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0947920296978 0.0758088955206 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190913570153 0.150359130593 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600216403908 0.0667264976115 90% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 14.1392134831 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.8420337079 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 100.480337079 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.