Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition

Essay topics:

Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition.

The statement suggests that universities should provide free education to students who cannot afford tuition but they are admitted to the University. I agree with the statement. Education has been proven essential for society had that been in the field of science, arts, or commerce. All people of the country do not share equal economical status. Many of the students can not afford university fees as they live parsimonious life and university education requires a significant amount of wealth. To ensure that these students acquire the education they are worthy of, the government should provide economical help to such students as it is beneficial for the nation.

The students admitted to the universities are capable of defining the future of the country. They lead the nation to the better welfare of the people of the country. Research work happening in the universities help the nation to develop in many areas. For example, research in science and technology helps the nation to develop in the areas of the military which leads to a powerful nation, developments in technology make efficient use of time and easier lifestyle. The universities provide learning of arts, which provides great artists to the nation. Some of these masterpieces created by the great artist attract tourism in the nation, for example, Italy which is known for its great artists and some of their great work. Better economists ameliorate the economy of the country and lead to the development of the country. The government should make sure that the true talent of the nation does not remain unvalued due to the destitution and hence it is necessary and beneficial for the country to offer free education to the students who cannot afford the tuition.

However, one may argue that the university's funds should go to research and not to remunerate the student's fees. Also, it can be said that not all students contribute to the great work in the university which leads to a waste of the university's funding. Nonetheless, universities provide admits to those who are worthy of it. Many of them adopt a merit-based admission process which leads to the admission of only those erudite students. So providing funds for them will ensure that the money is invested in better resources.

To conclude, I agree that universities should provide free education to those students who cannot afford the tuition. However, the students must be chosen on merit-based or some other system to ensure that the students getting free educations are worthy of it and they contribute to the development of the nation.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-10 guozhishan 58 view
2023-10-27 Oladelejnrr 50 view
2023-08-29 nigarsafarova 83 view
2023-08-24 Afolakemi 66 view
2023-07-09 ZHOU0444 83 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Pooja tank :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...eople of the country do not share equal economical status. Many of the students can not af...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07746478873 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7654664468 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413145539906 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5929045161 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04761904762 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41546847313 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139772065065 0.0831039109588 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162890449911 0.0758088955206 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302305061215 0.150359130593 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102156168095 0.0667264976115 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 330, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
...eople of the country do not share equal economical status. Many of the students can not af...
^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, nonetheless, so, for example

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 18.0 11.3162921348 159% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 59.0 58.6224719101 101% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2163.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 426.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07746478873 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54310108192 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7654664468 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.413145539906 0.4932671777 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 691.2 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.5929045161 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04761904762 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 18.0 10.2758426966 175% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.41546847313 0.243740707755 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.139772065065 0.0831039109588 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162890449911 0.0758088955206 215% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.302305061215 0.150359130593 201% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102156168095 0.0667264976115 153% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.82 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.