Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research.
It aroused a huge controversy in both the public and academic circles last year that Dr. He secretly edited the genes of two babies LuLu and NaNa whereby the CRISPR-Cas9, a new gene editing technology. The statement argues that government should impose as less restrictions on scientific research as possible. I partially agree this statement because the suggestion, if applied, will be advantageous in some cases but will bring disastrous consequences in some other situations.
Few restrictions can encourage the scientists to think and try more boldly and discover or create more mechanisms or products which can benefit our humans. It is particularly salient example that Yuan Longping's team has made such a huge breakthrough on the hybrid rice. According to what Yuan said, the Chinese government just gave his team 40 million RMB which was a tremendous amount of fund to support his research on the new generation hybrid rice without more interference from government or requirement that they should have some kind of achievement. Yuan's, to all the Chinese people's delight, has a historic breakthrough in yield and resistence of hybrid rice, which makes China successfully feed the one fifth of the world's popularity with only 7 percent of area. Recently, their team has successfully cultivated a new type of hybrid rice which can adapt to the sea, which should have been impossible because rice is a species in fresh water. It is just the no restrictions that makes it possible for them to create and try without no fear and finally contribute to our society a lot.
However, corresponding restrictions on scientific researches are needed especially when these researches involve fields concerning nuclear weapons, moral issues, and virus or noxious materials, or it will have serious consequences. Scientists may do these researches out of curiosity, fame, and mony in the name of science and governments may provide these scientists with funds and resources for politic benefits. For instance, if every country in the world competes to develop nuclear weapons without any restrictions, the world would be put in danger and people would not feel safe because each country can threaten others by nuclear weapons, which is similar to what the North Korea is doing now. What is worse, some terrorists may really destroy the world when they take control of some turbulent countries and possess the nuclear weapons. So researches about these fields is totally forbidden around the world.
Furthermore, appropriate restrictions should be imposed on scientific researches to prevent corruption and the abuse of rights. As we all know, the funds of scientific researches are usually big amounts of money and it is easy to cause the corruptions if the expenditure is not transparent enough. Besides, it s not unusual that several researchers form a faction to exclude the real creative young scientists for their own benefits, which is obviously harmful to the scientific circle.
To sum up, I partially agree with this statement because it suits in some cases but brings serious consequences in other cases.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-28 | nha1806 | view | |
| 2024-11-25 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 54 | view |
| 2024-11-24 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 54 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 58 | view |
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 79 | view |
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all the people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 50
- Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their national state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain 78
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones. 50
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 77
- Government should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 257, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun restrictions is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...argues that government should impose as less restrictions on scientific research as ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 726, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
... successfully feed the one fifth of the worlds popularity with only 7 percent of area....
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, furthermore, however, if, may, really, so, for instance, kind of, in some cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 14.8657303371 148% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 12.9106741573 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2627.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 501.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24351297405 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.73107062784 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93197335308 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 274.0 215.323595506 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546906187625 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 786.6 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.9317264591 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.944444444 118.986275619 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.27777777778 5.21951772744 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228186913074 0.243740707755 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0794554615384 0.0831039109588 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102341193692 0.0758088955206 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117327817284 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729990529759 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 14.1392134831 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 100.480337079 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.