Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
The choice between the two is not a trivial one. One has to spend hours thinking about this and once the decision has been made immediately begin to second guess it. The prompt recommends government to put few restriction on scientific research and development department. I mostly disagree with this suggestion and believe that science destroys boundaries for couple of reasons.
To begin, scientific research is always volatile, one of the few experiments going wrong cannot justify putting restrictions and hinder the entire scientific community. Thus, putting restrictions will hamper the scientific research and development. For instance, over the last couple of years we have witnessed surge of covid and its variants. If there would have been restrictions on scientific research and community then there would have been a slim hope of getting a vaccine. Since, there were not any kind of restriction, we got the vaccine with great speed and hence most of the world has been recovered. Just imagine ,If we would have received vaccines yet, where would be the world at the moment! The above example illustrates why government should not interfere with scientific research and development. But, leaving them loose entirely may affect humanity, only future will tell us so.
Further, scientific research and development is absolute necessary without involvement of government institutes as it may cause inconvenience for the research institute as it is habit of government to micro-manage things. For instance, one can compare the two institutes of space, nasa and spaceX , former one being government and latter being a private institution. The spacex is already in motion of sending people to mars and then over there building a civilization , meanwhile nasa is nowhere near it . Hence, government should not much interfere for scientific research and development.
Ofcourse some argue that, too much of independency left for scientific community may later harm as they may turn it into business deals which may affect the common people. However, this is not precise as turning scientific research and development into business as it may harm them and they may lose their good name in this process. That’s why government should not interfere with the scientific research and development.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 353, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
...rge of covid and its variants. If there would have been restrictions on scientific research and...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 623, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...e world has been recovered. Just imagine ,If we would have received vaccines yet, ...
^^
Line 2, column 631, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had received'?
Suggestion: had received
...has been recovered. Just imagine ,If we would have received vaccines yet, where would be the world ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 817, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cientific research and development. But, leaving them loose entirely may affect h...
^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...two institutes of space, nasa and spaceX , former one being government and latter ...
^^
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s already in motion of sending people to mars and then over there building a civi...
^^
Line 3, column 421, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'mar'.
Suggestion: mar
...already in motion of sending people to mars and then over there building a civiliza...
^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... then over there building a civilization , meanwhile nasa is nowhere near it . Hen...
^^
Line 3, column 505, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...tion , meanwhile nasa is nowhere near it . Hence, government should not much inter...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, may, second, so, then, thus, while, as to, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 24.0 33.0505617978 73% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 25.0 12.9106741573 194% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1935.0 2235.4752809 87% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3453038674 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90841758529 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541436464088 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 591.3 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.3060344802 60.3974514979 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.5 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1111111111 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.94444444444 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.369622532654 0.243740707755 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125888707811 0.0831039109588 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135333325624 0.0758088955206 179% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.214265700307 0.150359130593 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0361228396934 0.0667264976115 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.86 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.