Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Scientific research and development is the basis for the grandeur of achievement we human beings have made till today and will be making tomorrow. The scientific research, with no doubt can be accredited to the difference in comfort, knowledge and achievement we witness today to that of the previous century. However, is our nature as conscious being to be curious not only of the elements and processes that better us but also of those that could harm us hence the scientific research are done on all spheres either good or evil. Hence, I believe that the restriction helps to keep the scientific research under check and keep away the negative impacts of the research.
The scientific research, when kept under the limitations prevents the nature and the play of natural force. For instance, we can consider the field of genetic engineering. Genetic engineering is the branch of science which manipulates the genes and its components to modify an organism or population of organisms. Genetic engineering, in agriculture has provided with many disease resistant plants and animals that can thrive in the extreme conditions, however when the plants and animals are continuously engineered, they lose their natural ability to struggle in the extreme climatic conditions and will always have to be engineered with changing condition and resurgence of new types of disease pathogens. Also, in the pursuit of producing the large amount of food via. engineered plants and animals, the indigenous plants are not prioritized causing the deterioration and loss of genetic resources.
The researcher cannot be entirely objective and devoted to the research and its element if he/she is to be conscious of their boundaries. The research might demand the performance of certain process or use of certain elements that is limited by the restrictions and so their research has to be consciously limit the achievement of the research. For e.g. when conducting the research on nuclear reaction, the researcher will not be able to test it as per his/ her wish but has to comply with the strict guidelines, owing to which though the nuclear reaction is capable of generating large amount of power it is limited to few areas on the globe. However, the nuclear power accidents in the world has proved it to be worthwhile.
The restriction placed on the research might not only be due to consideration of its physical or biological impact but it might also be due to the emotional damage it can cause to the human. In social science surveys, researcher need to consider the rights of a fellow human being and need to place the questions within a certain discipline in such a way that the respondent is at comfort in answering the question. Some might arue that, the limitations can forge the data as it might hinder certain parameters of the research, however it brings the question of at what cost should the research be conducted? Let us consider the instance of the research based on the sexual assault victim. The researchers on such cases are limited bt various rules and acts of the nation and the researcher are found to be complaining about the restrictions. The police report of Nepal Police shows that in most rape cases the victims are greatly hostile and are unwilling to share much detail and hence arises the question is it achievement to gain insight of their cases or for them to heal.
Many might argue that there is always a restriction, while the danger does not always exist. However, the danger should not always be analyzed from human perspective only rather objectively from the point view of the world. The application of the pesticides to protect the crop was considered harmless and there was very few or none restriction in its application but now research indicates it to be the leading cause of cancer. Similarly, the inorganic fertilizers were great amend to the low fertility of soil but now it is the cause of depleted nutrient base of soil. Hence, though the scientific research and development are the key to new achievements and solving problems it should always be under limit as famously said, “Too much of sugar is bitter.”
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-01 | MMoksha | 66 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little 75
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 66
- Government officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 66
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 56
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 773, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Engineered
...producing the large amount of food via. engineered plants and animals, the indigenous plan...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 618, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...ing large amount of power it is limited to few areas on the globe. However, the nu...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN_U[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun might seems to be uncountable; consider using: 'much might', 'a good deal of might'.
Suggestion: Much might; A good deal of might
...t of their cases or for them to heal. Many might argue that there is always a restrictio...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, e.g., hence, however, if, similarly, so, while, as to, for instance, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 41.0 19.5258426966 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 35.0 14.8657303371 235% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 95.0 58.6224719101 162% => OK
Nominalization: 29.0 12.9106741573 225% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3457.0 2235.4752809 155% => OK
No of words: 696.0 442.535393258 157% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96695402299 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.13632280105 4.55969084622 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8043058397 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 319.0 215.323595506 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458333333333 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1071.9 704.065955056 152% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 14.0 4.99550561798 280% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.8807254972 60.3974514979 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.28 118.986275619 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.84 23.4991977007 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.52 5.21951772744 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23039672195 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665967040299 0.0831039109588 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589632997523 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133548766265 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551793031857 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 14.1392134831 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 48.8420337079 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 12.1743820225 103% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 162.0 100.480337079 161% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.