Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
I strongly agree with the statement that governments should place as little as possible restrictions on scientific research. For such a creative work as research studies it is important for everyone involved to think and act freely.
To begin with, I will introduce an example of negative impact on research sphere caused by restrictions from the government. In USSR a bunch of disciplines were prohibited: cybernetics, genetics, human rights studies. The totalitarian government didn’t fund researchers who tried to advance in these fields. Moreover, a couple of notorious scientists of that time were expelled from the official institutions because of their connections with these banned topics, some of them were imprisoned and even were shot. It is hard to imagine what would be the effect on the world’s science if these people would be free to work. From my point of view, these restrictions influenced the academia in the USSR extremely heavily and this effect is clear even today in modern Russia - there are not many groundbreaking developments in computer studies or in political theory from this country.
There is, however, the dark side of the science. As the science is often hard to understand by its nature, some popular anti-scientific convinctions often play a role of science for those who can not distinguish the real research from the fake one. In Covid-19 time, there was a huge amount of pdeudo-pharmaceutical meds, directed to alleviate people’s disease - all of these, of course, without any verification. A lot of ‘doctors’ in the Internet were also ready to tell why vaccination is harmful. Should the ‘science’ of this kind be banned? From my opinion, no. As the scientific works bases on the investments - from the governments or from the huge businesses - any ani-science can co-exist with real science, but because of the lower level of reliability, it will involve less money in it. I believe that society as a whole can decide what is ‘science’ and what it ‘anti-science’ for it - for its own good.
To conclude with, I absolutely support the idea that there should be as few as possible restrictions on science. Even when the science without restrictions goes the wrong way, the society can re-organize itself so that it will not make much harm.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-19 | Celestina Asantewaa | 83 | view |
| 2024-10-03 | shivamzala17 | 75 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | sefeliz | 83 | view |
| 2024-03-02 | LauraTing | 79 | view |
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree wi 66
- Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the well being of the societies and environments in which they operate Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations provided they operate within the law is to make as mu 50
- Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develop 70
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer 83
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14933333333 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17889835271 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562666666667 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1215703775 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.277777778 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141089111681 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468641637744 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566386879331 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105729051087 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569657102075 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, of course, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1931.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14933333333 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17889835271 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562666666667 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.1215703775 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.277777778 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141089111681 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0468641637744 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0566386879331 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105729051087 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569657102075 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.