Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">Stating that governments </span>should<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> place few if any, restrictions on scientific </span>research<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> and development, little </span>restrictions<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> are beneficial to the development of technologies and science. In some senses, it is true that interference on </span>research<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> </span>institute<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> decelerates the rate of development. In my point, however, when it comes to the immoral scientific researches and imprudent usage of technologies, it is proper to make rules for scientific researches.
Of course, Many would agree that the governments would be better to let </span>researchers<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> free. When a policy </span>is made<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> to selectively </span>proscribe<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> free researches, the rate would be slow and achievements would be little. For example, in Middle East nations, they made acts for </span>constraining<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> the bio-technologies because of the religious reason. As a result, their level of the field is lower than Western or East Asia countries. This implies that the less the limitations on the institute are, the more developing of science and technology is.
</span>Nonetheless<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">, can we say that little, if any, </span>bridle<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> on science is always helpful for human society? My answer is no. Regarding immoral researches done in human history, it could be necessary to limit those kinds of </span>researches<span style="font-size: 19.36px;">. For example, modern international organization, such as UN and IAEA </span>have been monitored<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> illegal activities about atomic, chemical and biological weapons which can randomly attack civilians and forces. This </span>example<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> </span>show<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> that some degree of limitation is essential for our public interest.
Moreover, in a circumstance which usage of a dangerous technology could be up to researchers' decision, the policies could be a key role in blocking indiscriminate usage of the technology. For example, in China, a scientist edited twins' gene to treat AIDS inheritance. Many other scientists </span>are worried<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> about the future of the twins and urge for politicians to make laws to guide the ways to genetic engineering. This shows that any researchers and engineer have </span>to be<span style="font-size: 19.36px;"> under the management of the specific standard
To summarize, it is undeniable that the development of science could make our lives more affluent. Regarding immoral technologies and indiscriminate usage of neutral scientific fact or technology, the policy-makers would be better to make laws which prevent those risks from occurring.</span><br>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pratysinha | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | asdfjmn | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | OliverRaab | 66 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | seonjungkim | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from a budget planner for the city of Grandview. (61, 141)"Our citizens are well aware of the fact that while the Grandview Symphony Orchestra was struggling to succeed, our city government promised annual funding to 42
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 55
- "Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions. The buildings were erected by different construction companies—Alpha and Zeta. Although the two buildings had identical floor plans, the b 79
- The following appeared in a health newsletter."A ten-year nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago, approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets, whereas today that numbe 55
- In a study of the reading habits of Waymarsh citizens conducted by the University of Waymarsh most respondents said that they preferred literary classics as reading material However a second study conducted by the same researchers found that the type of b 80
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 231, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'twins'' or 'twin's'?
Suggestion: twins'; twin's
...r example, in China, a scientist edited twins gene to treat AIDS inheritance. Many ot...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 616, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the management of the specific standard To summarize, it is undeniable that the ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 197, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f neutral scientific fact or technology, the policy-makers would be better to mak...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, nonetheless, regarding, so, for example, of course, such as, as a result, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 33.0505617978 76% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 58.6224719101 80% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2842.0 2235.4752809 127% => OK
No of words: 398.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 7.14070351759 5.05705443957 141% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 5.6443995233 2.79657885939 202% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535175879397 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 779.4 704.065955056 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 2.0 1.59117977528 126% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 77.4906007841 60.3974514979 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.888888889 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.94444444444 5.21951772744 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0788569871331 0.243740707755 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0336160024892 0.0831039109588 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472632753794 0.0758088955206 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0530076868543 0.150359130593 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054175121838 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.3 14.1392134831 165% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 15.31 48.8420337079 31% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 12.1743820225 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 24.13 12.1639044944 198% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.