Governments should place few, if any, restrictions on scientific research and development.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Scientific research and development is crucial for advancement of human race. As we progress further, we tend to innovate more systems and techniques to make our lives better and convenient. Today, most of the human population lives a comfortable life as opposed to a century ago, courtesy-science and technology. Scientists and researchers should be free to conduct research in the area of their interest with no interference. However, the research should be transparent and must be conducted only at the authorized institutions. The government must ensure that external forces-corporate, religious and so on, do not hamstring the scientific research capabilities of a nation
The society is always resistant to change. Back in the day, when governments used to be comprised of dogmatic monarchs, there was very little freedom for scientific research. Bible was the governing book and anything against the religion was considered a grave mistake. For instance, when Galileo suggested that earth is not in the centre of the universe, the government imprisoned him. Luckily, today most of the countries are liberal and do not oppose scientific research. As modern society became more accommodating, we saw many important scientific and technological innovations.
Today, we cannot imagine our world without cars, phones, internet and other devices that have become a part of our perfunctory life. Without scientific research, they would not exist. When computers were first introduced, they were opposed by a large section of the society. People assumed that their jobs will be replaced by a machine. Some also suggested that government should stop funding research in the area of computer technology. Today, computers provide jobs to numerous people and make our lives more comfortable. Currently, a similar trend is observed with AI and automation technology. If government puts restrictions on research in the field of the Artificial Intelligence and automation technology, we might devoid our self of many great future possibilities.
Some might argue that people can use the technology and research findings for their selfish needs. That is true! Therefore, we need strong governing bodies to overlook the implications of a scientific study. For instance, if a scientist develops a mechanism for cloning a perfect human being, the government must ensure that this technology remains secure from the hands of potential threats to humanity and not discontinue the research itself.
Ironically, many technologies used today were developed for the military applications-cell phone, internet, GPS are just a few of them. It is the way we use these technologies that makes a difference. Scientific research and development must be free, with little intervention from the government and a strong authority to overlook the applications of the study.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pratysinha | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | jason123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-09 | asdfjmn | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | muthukrishna | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 16 | view |
- When Stanley Park first opened, it was the largest, most heavily used public park in town. It is still the largest park, but it is no longer heavily used. Video cameras mounted in the park's parking lots last month revealed the park's drop in po 59
- Student performance should be the basis of salary for teachers 50
- Governments are not justified in circumventing civil laws in the name of national security 100
- Claim: In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimal role inprivate business matters.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim.In developing and supporting your position, be 50
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government, industry, or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation, not competition 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2418.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 439.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50797266515 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57737117129 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20074334588 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5284738041 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 753.3 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.5954612909 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.72 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.56 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36 5.21951772744 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142352969261 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0444572980196 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034111633085 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.088512226094 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0136342396611 0.0667264976115 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 14.1392134831 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.38 12.1639044944 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 100.480337079 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.