It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.
The given prompt states that it is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or wamn as a hero. On one hand, usually a team has to be given credit for any kind of successful attack or defence whereas on the other hand, one person can play a majority of the role in occluding an attack. He might give commands to the cavalry and preclude the attack. This is thus, a contentious issue and needs scrupulous analysis to arrive at any conclusion. However, I strongly agree that it is not possible for a society to regard a single man or woman as a hero.
To begin with, the major role played in preventing a major attack or protecting the civilians is done by a whole squad. In today's world with all the advance arms and amunition, it is physically impossible for a single person to protect everyone. In fact the number of soldiers in armies are usually in lacks or at least in thousands. For instance, few years back Indian army imposed a surgical strike in POK (Pakistan occupied Kashmir) which is the major place to harbor terrorists. However, one must pay attention that this was not a task achieved by one person, it was achieved by a group of trained soldiers. Thus, to attribute one person as a hero in the success of surgical strike would be both unfair and demotivating for others in the group.
Furthermore, if we are adamant to provide someone with the designation of a hero that saved the country, it would be very difficult to decide who the real hero is. For instance, a soldier is badly wounded in a war, but is treated with the best specialists and surgeons in the country. As a result, his life is saved. Who then is the true hero? The soldier who almost sacrified his life to protect the nation of the surgeons who, even in the environment filled with sounds of gunfire, saved the soldiers life? Thus, the it becomes very abstruse to choose someone as a title for hero. In fact, to avoid this, many nations have different medals and certificate that they give to honour the commendable work done by them.
However, one may argue that the person who is incharge of the whole coup must be credited and given the title of "hero" because he(or she) is the one who actually assisted the soldiers resulting in the victory. He also risked his life in order to protect the nation. Indeed, this topic is not limited to soldiers; It can be observed in day to day life also. Consider the case of Neerja Bhangot who saved sacrified her life to save myriad people from a plane that had been hijacked. She was a true hero as without much assistance besides a few crew members, she was able to rescue all the passangers safely. Hence, there are some cases were people are real heros. But, to directly state that the peson incharge of the coup was the one who should be attributed is flawed as he had help from many different sources which together could accomplish a mission.
From the points stated above, it is clear that even though there are certain cases where a person comes out to be a true hero, majority of the cases require a group of people to coordinate with each other for a successful completion of an event. Hence, it is clear that in majority of the cases, it is no longer possiblet to regard a man or a woman as hero.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-19 | reemks12 | 66 | view |
| 2024-05-25 | ayumiyazaki | 66 | view |
| 2024-05-25 | ayumiyazaki | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-21 | fstamim | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-21 | Zaima | 66 | view |
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 58
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this period most of the complaints received from viewers were concerned with our station s coverage of weather and lo 60
- Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather than by their own biological parents However my recent interviews with childr 55
- According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any other year And yet the percentage of positive reviews by movie reviewers about specific Super Screen movies actu 55
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they oppose specific points made in the reading passage 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 495, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'soldiers'' or 'soldier's'?
Suggestion: soldiers'; soldier's
...illed with sounds of gunfire, saved the soldiers life? Thus, the it becomes very abstrus...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
...gunfire, saved the soldiers life? Thus, the it becomes very abstruse to choose someone...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 361, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...; It can be observed in day to day life also. Consider the case of Neerja Bhangot wh...
^^^^
Line 7, column 798, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ttributed is flawed as he had help from many different sources which together could accomplish...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, so, then, thus, whereas, as to, at least, for instance, in fact, kind of, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 19.5258426966 189% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 33.0505617978 115% => OK
Preposition: 80.0 58.6224719101 136% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2670.0 2235.4752809 119% => OK
No of words: 597.0 442.535393258 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.47236180905 5.05705443957 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.94303383012 4.55969084622 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48259628547 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 279.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467336683417 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 872.1 704.065955056 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 15.0 6.24550561798 240% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3381167377 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8888888889 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.92592592593 5.21951772744 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 10.2758426966 214% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267694701735 0.243740707755 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826399164087 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.160256566884 0.0758088955206 211% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172626235684 0.150359130593 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.166016529304 0.0667264976115 249% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 48.8420337079 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.65 12.1639044944 71% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.