The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
There is no time in history that the life quality of human has improved so dramatically than the past several decades. As comtemporary life is getting more and more convenient and luxurious, some people are worried that, in this life stry, people are prvented from developing into truly strong and independent individuals. As far as I am concerned, I don't think their anxeity is superfluous, and the convenient comtemporary life actually make people grow up both physically and mentally.
People who are in favor of the prompt statement may argue that children from the latest generations are taken care by their parent too well that they do not grow up independently. Although I agree that nowadays some parents do overindulge their children, people in recent generations should be more independent overall. Because of the globalization, the job market has become fiercely competitive, and many tempting and rewarding jobs require people to leave home for a long time, settling down in a foreign country or even travelling around the world all the time. These job natures and life styles would make people experience many difficulties and force them to grow up more independently and mentally strong, while ancient people may have little chance to leave their village to have these kinds of adventures.
Primarily, with sufficient food and nutritions, people now are more healthy and stronger than those of previous generations. Take my family as an example. My parents and their siblings suffered from poverty and lack of food during their childhood; therefore, they are generally shorter than my cusins, my siblings and me. We can see, in this case, the rich modern life helps people grow stronger physically.
Some people may argue that people now do less exercise than before. Admittedly, in the generation of horse and buggy, simply by walking to schools or companies, people exercise a lot everyday. However, I do not think modern people have less work-out than ancient people. Thanks to the invention of gym and those wonderful work-out facilities, people now can keep their body fit and build muscles more efficiently. Many governments also provide sport courts where citizens can play basketball, footballs or tennis. Studies have showed that doing these sport contribute to not only our body health but also mental health by helping people managing stress and buiding social network during the game.
In conclusion, I think people are actually better developed with the wealthy and convenient contemporary life not only because we have different challenges in our generations that ancient people may not face, but also because we have more resource such as food and facilities to grow up.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-17 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | jason123 | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-01 | ayush.45 | 75 | view |
| 2019-10-04 | Persian Moonlight | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-01 | Varun Gohil | 50 | view |
- The increasingly rapid pace of life today causes more problems than it solves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and suppor 83
- A recent study indicates that children living in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal have lower levels of tooth decay than children living in suburban areas in the United States, despite the fact that people in the Himalayan mountain region in Nepal re 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 58
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 70
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 352, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ndividuals. As far as I am concerned, I dont think their anxeity is superfluous, and...
^^^^
Line 1, column 488, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le grow up both physically and mentally. People who are in favor of the prompt st...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 815, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llage to have these kinds of adventures. Primarily, with sufficient food and nutr...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e helps people grow stronger physically. Some people may argue that people now do...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ols or companies, people exercise a lot everyday. However, I do not think modern people ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 697, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... buiding social network during the game. In conclusion, I think people are actual...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 26.0 14.8657303371 175% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2287.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 437.0 442.535393258 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23340961098 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.57214883401 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7846478738 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 237.0 215.323595506 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54233409611 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 713.7 704.065955056 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => OK
Sentence length: 31.0 23.0359550562 135% => OK
Sentence length SD: 121.870540211 60.3974514979 202% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 163.357142857 118.986275619 137% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2142857143 23.4991977007 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.21951772744 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159226198733 0.243740707755 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0563535520344 0.0831039109588 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632357158254 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100375991133 0.150359130593 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544816041093 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.8 14.1392134831 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 48.8420337079 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.65 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 100.480337079 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 11.2143820225 128% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.83 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.