Many important discoveries or creations are accidental: it is usually while seeking the answer to one question that we come across the answer to another.
Although there are many discoveries or creations occurred by accident or it happened while searching answers to some other problems, there are many other discoveries, which are sought out purposely. Therefore, it is incorrect that many important discoveries or creations are accidental.
Although many important discoveries or creations are not accidental, many accidental discoveries in the world cannot be ignored. For instance, Columbus discovered a new continent, America, while he was on his route to find West Indies for trade. It is the accidental event in the past, but there is no more existences of accidents nowadays with the development of techonology. Astronomers can use more powerful telescopes to discover new planets and to know more about space, which is not an accidental any more.
In addition, most of the times, scientific discoveries are planned and precise through various researches, analyses and experiments in today’s society. The results are reliable and data-based, instead of accidental. When researchers want to create a new vaccine, they can't just randomly add something. Instead, they have to carefully conduct multiple experiments to find out which ingredients are effective. The outcome of vaccines is purposed, not accidental. Finally, the answer another somehow cannot be figured out while seeking the answer to one question since the probability is little.
As a result, many crucial discoveries or creations are not aciidental, especially in today’s society, since the answer is purposed which found out through researches and experiments, instead of getting the answer to one question while seeking another answer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-25 | batterylow_123 | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-15 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 16 | view |
| 2023-08-02 | okazaki11 | 80 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | jayauen | 83 | view |
| 2023-02-10 | Yam Kumar Oli | 58 | view |
- Claim We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own Reason Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning 54
- A recently issued twenty-year study on headaches suffered by the residents of Mentia investigated the possible therapeutic effect of consuming salicylates. Salicylates are members of the same chemical family as aspirin, a medicine used to treat headaches. 42
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
- Traffic here in Waymarsh is becoming a problem Although just three years ago a state traffic survey showed that the typical driving commuter took 20 minutes to get to work the commute now takes closer to 40 minutes according to the survey just completed M 58
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...hers want to create a new vaccine, they cant just randomly add something. Instead, t...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in addition, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 33.0505617978 24% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 252.0 442.535393258 57% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61904761905 5.05705443957 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06135298294 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.56746031746 0.4932671777 115% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.4797423352 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.923076923 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3846153846 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385140794614 0.243740707755 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120905312769 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141767033952 0.0758088955206 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251560029242 0.150359130593 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105097849561 0.0667264976115 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 12.1639044944 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.