In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most comp

Essay topics:

In most professions and academic fields, imagination is more important than knowledge.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

Imagination is an integral part of any profession, enabling professionals and academics to think beyond their own experience and transcend seemingly insurmountable boundaries of thought or possibility. Moreover, imagination is the gateway to knowledge, since intellectual curiosity is the quintessence of human nature, and without that pursuit of understanding, there would be no knowledge to glean. I must profess, however, that I am ambivalent towards this subject, torn between my desire to ascribe this value to imagination and, on the other hand, my appreciation of the knowledge bases which gov...

*** The full content of this essay is available to VIP readers

Votes
Average: 8.7 (5 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-02-26 hyein 83 view
2019-07-06 Primace 33 view
2018-10-08 shli 58 view
2019-07-03 evanlu 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user ncheels :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, while, after all, in fact, you know, in some cases, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 89.0 58.6224719101 152% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3007.0 2235.4752809 135% => OK
No of words: 564.0 442.535393258 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33156028369 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.87326216964 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18224577454 2.79657885939 114% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507092198582 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 949.5 704.065955056 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 6.24550561798 208% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 8.0 1.77640449438 450% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 13.0 4.38483146067 296% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9085161561 60.3974514979 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.681818182 118.986275619 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6363636364 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.13636363636 5.21951772744 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140910950223 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0461443858575 0.0831039109588 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0292281334057 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0827125201421 0.150359130593 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252181363228 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 48.8420337079 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 12.1743820225 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 157.0 100.480337079 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

flaws:
the length of the introduction is still relatively long. the introduction should be shorter and right on the point.

----------------------
the arguments are great.

----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 5.0 out of 6
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 22 15
No. of Words: 564 350
No. of Characters: 2926 1500
No. of Different Words: 278 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.873 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.188 4.6
Word Length SD: 3.082 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 220 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 182 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 133 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 107 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 25.636 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 10.12 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.5 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.326 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.543 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.131 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 6 5