A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous
The claim stated that student should learn identical subjectes stipulated by the aurthority. A plausible logic behind is that the society can boost the development of students in the same comprehensive way in addressing equity and easier management. Despite the conern beind such proposal is desirable, the statement is fully fallacious in my view.
The most manifest reason behind such objection is students are a group of people with especially diversified interest in different subjects, and it would have adverse effect on their development if the authority require all of them to learn the same subjects before college. It is widely known that there are two distinctive major branches in subjects, arts and science. If the designated uniform class encompass more classes about one, it would harrow the students with interest for the other. Meanwhile, it is not possible for the autority to encompass both science and arts subjects in the curriculum since students all have limited time. Furthermore, such issue would be a burden for those advanced students. In the case that some shrewd students want to learn more advanced subjects, such uniform regulation would then become the shackle for deveoping their flair. In summary, it is not possible for the curriculum to sate everyone's demand in a uniform curriculum.
Additionally, such proposal would also impose challenges for find appropriate instructors, becuase the instructors have various of domains they are good at in terms of teaching but the standardized curriculum would impose a restriction for them in what contents or subjects they could contain in their class. For instance, some teachers are trained to teach advanced calculus, but then the authority claimd that such content are now precluded in secondary education, then they could only follows such regulation and teach subjects they are not specialized at. Therefore, such proposal would limit the talent of some teachers so that it is self defeating.
Alternatively, it could be a more salient proposal for the authority to give several set of subjects students could choose. For instance, the subjects can be categoried into arts and science, and students can choose to learn one of them. In this approach, students can both choose what they are interested in and spend more time to learn those subjects in deepth. For teachers, they also have more flexibility in choosing what they are good at.
In conclusion, we can safely assert that the idea of adapting a uniform curriculum is not conducive for both students and teachers despite some considerations behind it might be desirable. An alternative approach of giving different set of curriculum is more feasible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-01 | kathleenkong | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-03 | trainyperson | 70 | view |
| 2023-12-18 | gretakernnnne | 66 | view |
| 2023-11-21 | Mithil | 50 | view |
| 2023-11-01 | qwertyy | 50 | view |
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the manager of WWAC radio station To reverse a decline in listener numbers our owners have decided that WWAC must change from its current rock music format The decline has occurred despite population growth in o 67
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 50
- Claim Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills Reason These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful 66
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun set seems to be countable; consider using: 'several sets'.
Suggestion: several sets
...ient proposal for the authority to give several set of subjects students could choose. For ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 379, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... those subjects in deepth. For teachers, they also have more flexibility in choos...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, second, so, then, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, in summary, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2273.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 431.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27378190255 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55637350225 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84391351094 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.477958236659 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 704.7 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7480482041 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.631578947 118.986275619 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6842105263 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05263157895 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133357581986 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480408189483 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0286611283142 0.0758088955206 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.077669358316 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0257693223663 0.0667264976115 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 100.480337079 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.8971910112 130% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.