A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college
A national curriculum is a set of curated topics prepared by a body in charge of educational affairs in a country. While some might be in support of all of its students taking a generalized curriculum before going for specialization in college, others would be in support of a student sticking to a curriculum that tallies with a desired career path before entering College. With the two points outlined below, you will get to understand why I strongly believe students should take a unified curriculum before gaining admission to College.
To start with, students being allowed to take shared curriculum in a country is actually for a good cause. For instance, the educational standard followed in Nigeria allows student to use a shared curriculum for the first 9 years of their education. Afterwards, they can proceed to college to pick a career path to specialize in. During the course of their specialization, a general course is even still introduced that can come from any background but the students still get to ace the course due to their extensive background. Also, the shared curriculum allows students to have background knowledge of the field that exists so they are better informed when the time comes to follow a preferred career path. When they eventually graduate and get employed, they are usually adaptable and flexible, a result of their academic training. Taking a close look at this, one can see how students being allowed to take a uniform curriculum before picking a specialization greatly benefits a nation.
Further, with a foundation of shared curriculum, it has a way of setting one up for success with less demand/effort. For example, imagine if one started his academics based on a shared national curriculum and proceeded to college to specialize in becoming a Medical Doctor perhaps with a reason of finding cure to diseases such as HIV but later along the line finds out that He has a strong interest in carrying out investigations and reporting crime scenes and decides He wants to be a Journalist, such an individual can easily switch field based on the fact that while growing up, He has been provided with the rudiments to thrive in any career part, a consequence of a shared national curriculum. Imagine how such a career change can be demanding for one who is not a product of a shared curriculum. With this, one can see how a nation should honestly adopt a shared national curriculum at the early stages of the students' education.
In summary, meticulously considering the two points identified, one would admit that a shared national curriculum would be key to preventing students from undertaking courses being imposed upon them by their parents or guardians which would have been the case if a Nation does not support a shared national curriculum as many would still be undecided about the right career path at such an infant stage.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
| 2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
| 2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
| 2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'During'.
Suggestion: During
...to pick a career path to specialize in. During the course of their specialization, a general course ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 918, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...l curriculum at the early stages of the students education. In summary, meticulously ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, honestly, if, look, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2403.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96487603306 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88663723213 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49173553719 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 130.129610602 60.3974514979 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 160.2 118.986275619 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2666666667 23.4991977007 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 5.21951772744 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258134080488 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980688133985 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556662155408 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169471139126 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256227472937 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.1392134831 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.8420337079 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 331, Rule ID: DURING_THE_COURSE_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'During'.
Suggestion: During
...to pick a career path to specialize in. During the course of their specialization, a general course ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 918, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...l curriculum at the early stages of the students education. In summary, meticulously ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, first, honestly, if, look, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in summary, such as, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 78.0 58.6224719101 133% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2403.0 2235.4752809 107% => OK
No of words: 484.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96487603306 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69041575982 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88663723213 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.49173553719 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 773.1 704.065955056 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 23.0359550562 139% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 130.129610602 60.3974514979 215% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 160.2 118.986275619 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.2666666667 23.4991977007 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46666666667 5.21951772744 162% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258134080488 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980688133985 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0556662155408 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169471139126 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0256227472937 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 14.1392134831 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.0 48.8420337079 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 12.1743820225 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.08 12.1639044944 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 100.480337079 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 11.2143820225 132% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.