“A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.”
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
One of the most important identifiers of the quality and productivity of the next generation of a nation is the Nation's Education System. The Nation's Education System is a framework which acts as the foundation for anyone to get started academically. A common national curriculum will be one of the very important factor, if not the most, in building that foundation.
A common national curriculum is the first step in ensuring that each and every student of the country is able to get the same level of training and access to same level of resources that any other student gets, irrespective of the socio-economic background. The most unfair advantage that any wealthy person gets is the head-start in their life due to their background without any effort on their part and there should be no space left in the education system for allowing this. Our Education system should ideally present opportunities to students based on their hardwork and talent, but this is far from the truth. The amount of opportunities that is available to a rich person's child in the nation's top schools compared to a poor child is alarming. A common national curriculum is a first step in the right direction to bring down this disparity of opportuities between students of the same country, giving all them access to same quality of Education.
Having a common national curriculum will allow all the students to build their foundations on the same knowledge and this in turn will ensure that only the hardworking students are rewarded. This also has an added benefit that it will help bring down the economic disparity in the country since now, wealthy students have no advantage compared to the poor ones since even if the school they go to are best in the country, the syllabus that they teach is the same as the one they teach in any public/charity-run schools. Also, this common national curriculum will ensure each student is on the same page when they take other national level exams like SAT for admissions the undergrad schools for college.
Though having a common national curriculum is one of the best moves to empower every student of the nation, care must be taken that this is flexible enough to cater to the varying needs of all students, since the talents of every student is different and they must not be made to try to fit in. Rather the system should be flexible. If done right, this move has the power to change the quality of the next generation
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-01 | Opak Pulu | 54 | view |
| 2019-11-27 | ryuha | 83 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | rogannithin | 90 | view |
| 2019-09-14 | kkkk_kkkk | 83 | view |
| 2019-08-29 | Amey Waghmode | 50 | view |
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 83
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks.a 54
- “A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.”Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the pos 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...portunities that is available to a rich persons child in the nations top schools compar...
^^^^^^^
Line 8, column 296, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...they must not be made to try to fit in. Rather the system should be flexible. If done ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2036.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81323877069 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69249600402 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439716312057 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 639.9 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 78.7823467743 60.3974514979 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.428571429 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.2142857143 23.4991977007 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.71428571429 5.21951772744 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207273316238 0.243740707755 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0838656713901 0.0831039109588 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505745122667 0.0758088955206 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138092717367 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.02294224306 0.0667264976115 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.21 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.