A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how those examples shape your position.
The education system serves a vital role, perhaps even the most important role, in all developed countries. Therefore, any education reform should undergo an extensive scrutiny before it is put in place. While the recommendation to standardize all pre-college education has its merits, the government should implement such a drastic change with caution as it might hinder the proper development of talented pupils.
Viewing the education system as a whole, total standardization promises many desirable effects. For instance, universities could admit students based on their grades because they would be comparable across different school and both universities and employers could rely on students having certain minimum knowledge in all areas listed in the national curriculum after graduating high school. Comparable education across all groups of graduates, be it pupils from overcrowded public schools or students attending selective private institutions, would also break down some of the divides between economic classes making kids of both wealthy and poor parents equally attractive to prospective employers and universities. With the wealth inequality rising at an alarming rates in countries including the USA, such changed could combat this problem by serving as an equalizer.
However, such promises are too good to be true. While following the standardized curriculum would lead to the same level of education on paper, the implementation of the recommendation would play out completely differently depending on the means of a particular school. Teaching in public school with populous classes would inevitably gloss over many complex topics in the curriculum due to a lack of time for attending to struggling students individually, whereas private school could afford to properly go though each topic and make sure it pupil understands it thoroughly. Furthermore, parents exercise more control over the format of lessens in private school and would pressure the teachers to cover additional topic outside of the national curriculum to better prepare their children for future studies. Therefore, national curriculum would be deceptive in its ability to equalize education among school with different means.
Last but not least, exception talents often manifests itself before a pupil reaches university. To cater to these students and nurture their talents, various specialized institutions exist. For example, high school focused on music serve musical prodigies and mathematical gymnasiums search for future great mathematicians. Rolling out a standardized system rigidly, without any regard to various abberations in the existing system, would hinder the ability of the system to find and nurture exceptionally talented pupils In conclusion, a standardized curriculum could change the education system for the better, providing similar education to all students. However, we should not be deceived by its promises, as its not a silver bullet for all social problems. Furthermore, if the curriculum is too rigid, it could hurt some groups of students.
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure t 87
- The expression "Never, never give up" means to keep trying and never stop working for your goals. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 70
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 83
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your rea 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 567, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ate institutions, would also break down some of the divides between economic classes making...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, therefore, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 11.3162921348 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2618.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7037037037 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00699216645 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557734204793 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 819.9 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 23.0359550562 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 91.4766549184 60.3974514979 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.444444444 118.986275619 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 23.4991977007 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.21951772744 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144614323736 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047447233803 0.0831039109588 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0394930335837 0.0758088955206 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0922029312078 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122825223338 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 14.1392134831 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 48.8420337079 60% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 12.1743820225 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.1639044944 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.86 8.38706741573 118% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 11.2143820225 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.