A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
The education system that a nation develops and introduces to its students can have a major impact on that nation's future. Whether students should be required to study the same national curriculum until college, as introduced in the prompt, is a major topic of discussion. I strongly believe that all students should be exposed to the same material until they reach college, at which point they may choose to pursue their own passions and interests. My claim is based on two main reasons.
First of all, differences in curriculum will inherently create an advantage for some students entering college. For instance, let's take two prospective students, in different curriculums, that are applying for college to get into an engineering program. If one curriculum was heavily math and science based, then the student studying that curriculum would have an unfair advantage when applying to college over the student in another curriculum. The student in the math and science curriculum would undoubtly convince the engineering program that he or she is a better prospect for that program based on his or her pre-college studies. By requiring all student to engange in the same national curriculum, this inherent bias is removed and all students get a fair shot at applying for their desired college programs on the basis of individual accomplishment, rather than curricular advantages.
Additionally, requiring students to study the same national curriculum will result in a more passionate and diverse work-force in the nation's future. For instance, a student studying a curriculum that is heavily skewed towards engineering, might never get the chance to discover their passion for arts or history. Then, that student may live their whole life, never being at his or her full potential. This would create a work-force that is not engaged in their jobs, and therefore not producing the full output that a nation needs. Therefore, having a balanced national curriculum for everyone benefits the nation in the long-run due to a more passionate work-force.
Some people may argue that having differing curriculums across the nation will help to test what curriculum works best. However, there are various ways to test the performance of a curriculum and the inherent bias in having different curriculums should be reason enough to implement a national curriculum. After all, the future of the younger generation may determine the future of the whole nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-10 | ali.rs | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-10 | ali.rs | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Sumaiya Mila | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-29 | Shams Tarek | 62 | view |
| 2019-12-17 | ali.rs | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 257, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'reasoned'?
Suggestion: reasoned
... having different curriculums should be reason enough to implement a national curricul...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, after all, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 33.0505617978 91% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2071.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26972010178 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84746353998 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.498727735369 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 648.9 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1845500659 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.823529412 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1176470588 23.4991977007 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.88235294118 5.21951772744 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316302090424 0.243740707755 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1160288374 0.0831039109588 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685553881321 0.0758088955206 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206921438629 0.150359130593 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555926503907 0.0667264976115 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 48.8420337079 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.