A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how those examples shape your position.
Should a nation require all students to study the same national curriculum until college is a dire mistake. While there are some positives to uniform education, they are not strong enough reasons to adopt this recommendation. Forcing everyone in a nation to learn the same thing until college is a way to create unity, however, it is not the most beneficial for a nation.
A main drawback to the same education for all includes: limiting people and their choices, which is a violation of natural rights. Students deserve the right to choose what type of education they receive. The main question is, if a national curriculum was determined, who determines what every student must learn? This is a pivotal decision that must be made, because it can determine the future of a nation. Take our country, the United States of America for instance, we used to have one of the best education systems in the world. America is slowly declining in the education department because everyone is forced to learnt the same things until college. Sure, there is a minuscule amount of leeway in choosing classes, but there is no variety in education. According to a study from the University of Stanford, China, Sweden and England have 18%, 21%, and 24%, respectively better intelligence quotients than the rest of the world. While the US has stayed stagnant.
According to scientists, stagnation leads to death. Now death is extreme in this case, but a better interpretation is: stagnation will cause the US to fall further and further down the education totem due to many other countries improving and adapting their education. A big reason for the jump in IQ is due to the schools that specialize in certain fields such as: organic chemistry, electrical engineering, and such. This specialization allows students that have a passion for these fields to foster and grow their fondness of the field they are studying. Limiting a student to a set curriculum will only hold back education growth.
On the other hand, forcing all students in a nation to study the same curriculum will ensure that everyone will have a base knowledge of what is being taught. This will also allow the government to control what exactly is taught to students and omit certain things unwanted to be taught. While these are some good reasons to enforce a uniform national curriculum, they do not overrule the violation of our natural human rights of choice. There will not be enough variety in a nation that everyone knows the same thing.
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 59
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 937, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e quotients than the rest of the world. While the US has stayed stagnant. Accordi...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, while, for instance, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 12.9106741573 163% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2085.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92907801418 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69568861066 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 215.323595506 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.503546099291 0.4932671777 102% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.229076326 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2857142857 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1428571429 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.57142857143 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249779834729 0.243740707755 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0749325333693 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794855230187 0.0758088955206 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168711340931 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0931838938388 0.0667264976115 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.