Nowadays, deforestation is common problem faced by countries. This problem is aroused due to excess cutting of trees for creating furniture, wooden articles, houses, fuel purpose and many more. Deforestation leads in decrease of sanctuary areas or are dedicated for wild life. As the area goes on degrade it will not only create problems to citizens but also to environment. Like deforestation will generate less amount of oxygen as compared to pastime or will force wild animals to get out of wilder areas to gather sufficient amount of food. This will eventually create havoc situation for human being.
Restricting large scale industries or citizens from exploiting forest areas will not only help use but eventually save human being from getting hunted by wild animals. For example, Government of India started an initiative to increase population of Asian cheetah's by relocating African cheetah's in India. This initiative was taken just to save Asian cheetahs from getting extinct. This problem would have never if there were strong laws to prevent wilder areas in order to save species.
Deforestation lead to wild fires in Brazil which might have lead to killing of several animals, plants, vegetation and disrupting the natures behaviour. If law is enacted early it will help to restore natural vegetation exploited by human being and several companies on the name of development. It would even help to lower carbon footprint which is essential for living a disease free normal life. If we are restricting the process of deforestation by strict rules and regulation it will help to maintain the natural cycle of life and also improve if damaged somehow.
Saving wild and wilder areas should be main motive if want to keep going natural cycle flawlessly. Exploiting wilder areas or natural vegetation will only disrupt the way of living of human being. No matter how we justify the deforestation but it will at last land in havoc situation.
Keeping all the situation into consideration nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness area in their natural state. And should take care that no violation should take place at any conditions.
- Some people believe that universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study Others believe that universities should not force to take any courses other than those that will help prepare them for job 83
- In any situation progress requires discussion among people who have contrasting points of view 50
- Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species despite the expense to humans in effort time and financial well being Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts especially at a great cost in money an 62
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition 58
- Claim Major Policy decisions should always be left to politicians and other government experts Reason Politicians and other government experts are more informed and thus have better and perspective than do members of general public 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'natures'' or 'nature's'?
Suggestion: natures'; nature's
..., plants, vegetation and disrupting the natures behaviour. If law is enacted early it w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 33.0505617978 39% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 2235.4752809 81% => OK
No of words: 351.0 442.535393258 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16809116809 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32839392791 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72875880679 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 704.065955056 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.2992745133 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 95.4736842105 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4736842105 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.94736842105 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280461155396 0.243740707755 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882436038821 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.163618930104 0.0758088955206 216% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192876748417 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.206855153841 0.0667264976115 310% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.