Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state even if these areas could be developed for economic gain

Essay topics:

Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.

The statement argues that in order to preserve the wilderness area than the nation should pass a law that will barred all the activities that would harm these area even it is for the economic gain. Many of us will argue that it will hold all the time, while others will counter this. In my essay, I will highlight both the side of the statement and will provide sound reasoning for the same.

Economic activities are essential for a nation in order to develop and they should grasp all the possible opportunities to flourish. Economic activities are also essential to produce jobs, since people will get well-paying jobs which they will spend at other businesses and make them flourish and do their part for contributing to the economy, for example, if the government or an organization start a project of excavation of oil, then it will not only provide the economic benefits but also jobs to the many people.

However, all the activities related to money should be done with keeping mind that it should not be harmful to the environment or wildlife. They should be done with the minimum possible harm to the environment. Because we all know that how much environment is important for the human being and if exploit for the economic gain, than it would be very hazardous for the human kind. We would get some benefit if environment being exploited but for the short period of time.

Furthermore, it is important for us to protect the wildlife which resides in the wilderness. For example, the bees depend on forests that though could be cut down for cheap and locally produced raw materials (mainly wood), will instead produce a negative impact on the environment. This is because the bees are the primary pollinators of flowers and the trees that were cut down will worsen global warming. Thus, since the environment is at stake when wilderness areas such as forests are cut down for economic gain, it is reasonable to preserve the trees to eschew CO2 levels in the air and to keep bees pollinating their flowers, which is important for farmers and the prosperity of many species of plants.

In nutshell, as mentioned above economic activities are important for the country growth and we should encourage them but with keep in mind that we should not harm the environment.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-09-01 batterylow_123 66 view
2024-07-09 jiwon12 66 view
2024-01-10 Tammy__kk 83 view
2023-09-30 rimpiG 54 view
2023-05-19 shubham1102 50 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user ayush2711 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 154, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this area' or 'these areas'?
Suggestion: this area; these areas
...rred all the activities that would harm these area even it is for the economic gain. Many ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 329, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...g and if exploit for the economic gain, than it would be very hazardous for the huma...
^^^^
Line 5, column 456, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...nment being exploited but for the short period of time. Furthermore, it is important for us...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, so, then, thus, well, while, as for, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 58.6224719101 70% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1896.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 393.0 442.535393258 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82442748092 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59518284604 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465648854962 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 583.2 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 23.0359550562 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 84.9911459974 60.3974514979 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.428571429 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.0714285714 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.21951772744 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296018200907 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109500153875 0.0831039109588 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111540293859 0.0758088955206 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155302127545 0.150359130593 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450319541571 0.0667264976115 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.52 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 12.1743820225 107% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 11.2143820225 118% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.