Nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state , even if these areas could be developed for economic gain.
With the development of technology and finance, many wild regions have become to factories which are produced plentitude of product. It causes that variety of animals lose their habitats. In my opinion, nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas, while sometimes these areas still should turn into industrial land. All of them are depend on how wealthy is the nation.
First, In addition to human’s lives, each animal in the world has ability to possess areas which are suitable for them to live such as fish as ocean and birds as forest. Humanity do not have right to deprive their habitats. Moreover, for those wealthy nations, because financial foundation of those nations are already firm, they have ways to create economic gain without destroying those areas. Taiwan, for example, it is already a developed country, most people in our country have enough savings to feed ourselves. Therefore, the government passes many laws to preserve some areas which are habitats of endanger species. In this way, it can maintain our biodiversity.
Moreover, preserve these areas for other animals can also develop the tourism. Maintaining biodiversity or preserving endemic species can appeal many other countries tourists to experience different feelings from their countries. Therefore, nations can develop some ecological tourist guide to let tourists realize more about their ecology. Restaurants and hotels also get benefits by this guideline. All of above proofs that preserve these species’ habitats can also have economic gain.
However, if the nation is in poverty and lack of firm economical foundation, proscribing enterprise to develop these areas will let the country do not have chance to consolidate their economical foundation. Without the doubt, industrial development is the best way to enhance nation’s competitiveness. Therefore, appropriately developing these areas can let their citizens out of poverty. However, Despite that exploiting these areas is be accepted, they should comply strictly with guideline of ecological conservation and can not arbitrarily destroy the environment for development.
I consider that nations should pass laws to preserve any remaining wilderness areas in their natural state, while if the nation is fighting against poverty, it can be partly accepted to exploit these areas for development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-01 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2024-07-09 | jiwon12 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-10 | Tammy__kk | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-30 | rimpiG | 54 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | shubham1102 | 50 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Famous entertainers and athletes deserve to have more privacy than they have now Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 90
- Carved stone balls are a curious type of artifact found at a number of locations in Scotland They date from the late Neolithic period around 4 000 years ago They are round in shape they were carved from several types of stone most are about 70 mm in diame 76
- Formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and su 50
- The following memorandum is from the business manager of Happy Pancake House restaurants Recently butter has been replaced by margarine in Happy Pancake House restaurants throughout the southwestern United States This change however has had little impact 52
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 357, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...n into industrial land. All of them are depend on how wealthy is the nation. First, ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 438, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'been'.
Suggestion: been
... Despite that exploiting these areas is be accepted, they should comply strictly w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, as for, for example, in addition, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 58.6224719101 75% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2017.0 2235.4752809 90% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5564738292 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82776163015 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561983471074 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.8508124358 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.85 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.15 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.05 5.21951772744 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.482484359497 0.243740707755 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.131979901107 0.0831039109588 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.133246884509 0.0758088955206 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.307636164092 0.150359130593 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.13682023396 0.0667264976115 205% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.67 12.1639044944 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.