Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Using money for poor people is not something new in any society. The fact that we can take some money from art or any other subject and divide that money to poor and indigent people could be really beneficial for the well-being of that society and I strongly agree with that assumption because of three reasons.
First of all, government could use that amount of money to create some new job positions and help some company to develope and create some job description in order to solve the unemployment. For example government wants to help to music industry but instead it could help some company to defeat bankruptcy.
Secondly, government could give some money to different charities in order to help unemployment and pauper people. In this case money could spend in the better way and it also could help so many people with different issues. For example it could to various type of charities.
Third of all, government could identify struggled people directly and give them some money as a loan in order to help them pass unpleasant days. For instance government could give some money to unemployed people until they find proper jobs.
Although it is a prevalent opinion that we should not spend money that is assigned for art but I think in the case of bad economic situations and in the special condition, we could spend that money for poor and unemployment people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-28 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | Himanshu Sharma | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-19 | AC1990 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-16 | jason123 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
- The following appeared in a letter from a homeowner to a friend."Of the two leading real estate firms in our town — Adams Realty and Fitch Realty — Adams Realty is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents; in contrast, Fitch has 25, many 50
- TPO-18 - Integrated Writing Task 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?At universities and colleges, sports and social activities are just as important as classes and libraries and should receive equal financial support.Use specific reasons and examples to support your an 73
- Nations should suspend government funding for the arts when significant numbers of their citizens are hungry or unemployed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning f 33
- Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activity. Others feelthat human activity makes the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specificreasons and examples to support your answer. 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...itions and help some company to develope and create some job description in order...
^^
Line 7, column 51, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to people'
Suggestion: to people
...ll, government could identify struggled people directly and give them some money as a ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, really, second, secondly, so, third, well, for example, for instance, i think, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 58.6224719101 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 2235.4752809 51% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 237.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.83966244726 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50711746541 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 215.323595506 53% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485232067511 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 351.0 704.065955056 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.3473756362 60.3974514979 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.7 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3 5.21951772744 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0713823864216 0.243740707755 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0374662606463 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0171947251269 0.0758088955206 23% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0480724294189 0.150359130593 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133971923414 0.0667264976115 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 100.480337079 37% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.8971910112 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.