No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The author claim that no field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field. Some people, however, might hold the contrary argument that just focusing on one field can be more efficient to improve the knowledge. For me, with some qualification, I fundamentally agree with the author.
Admittedly, in some field, researchers need to concentrate on their own study to achieve advance. For example, physicist and mathematician may only focus on the logic of science and numbers, and try their best to discover the unfound in their own realm. They don't need to care about the outside world, and can make significant achievement.
Nevertheless, aside from this exceptional field mentioned above, most realm of study can advance more tremendously by incorporate with other field. Take medicine and sociology for example. In my country, universities require all medical students take sociology courses, because the educator believe that without understanding of human behavior, doctors can not make the best treatment for patients. Also, examples abound in agriculture and GIS which are two apparently disparate areas. Now many farmers take advantage of GIS to manage their farm, reckon their yield, record the relation between farming technic and spatial condition. Because of the advance of GIS, farming is much easier in the modern society.
Additionally, cooperating with different field help people brain-storming and engender distinctive advance. People restricted in their own realm may sometimes become stubborn, and their reasoning line could be rigid. Communicating with others who come from unfamiliar field may help people jumping out the rigid deduction, and get significant achievement.
To sum up, aside from sweeping generalization that "no field" can get prominent achievement unless it incorporates knowledge from others, I fundamentally agree that study could advance more distinctively or quickly if it takes advantage of knowledge from outside that field.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Movies and television have more negative effects than the positive effects on the way young people behave Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Many countries require cigarette smokers to pay particularly high taxes on their purchases of cigarettes similar taxes are being considered for unhealthy foods The policy of imposing high taxes on cigarettes and other unhealthy products has a number of so 81
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement People should buy the products made in their own country 73
- The surest indicator of a great nation is represented not by the achievements of its rulers artists or scientists but by the general welfare of its people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement a 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...er the unfound in their own realm. They dont need to care about the outside world, a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 19.5258426966 20% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 58.6224719101 77% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1749.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 307.0 442.535393258 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69706840391 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04518975062 2.79657885939 109% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 215.323595506 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.599348534202 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 544.5 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.59117977528 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.8186534071 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.3125 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1875 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.21951772744 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330532444119 0.243740707755 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.106948006 0.0831039109588 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116149366035 0.0758088955206 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191866497634 0.150359130593 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975717297039 0.0667264976115 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 48.8420337079 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 12.1639044944 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 100.480337079 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.