No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Our world provides us with a lot of choices with regards to fields of study, for example Engineering, Medicine, Business, Arts and many more. These fields have drastically burgeoned over the years. They may or may not have used outside knowledge to gain this growth, hence, I mostly agree with the prompt, although, I do concede that not all fields need to gain knowledge from other ones to be able to flourish.
To begin with, most fields of study are multidisciplinary ones. One has to have knowledge from other fields to be able to progress well. For example, engineering is a field which usually helps other areas, so just learning about engineering concepts and applying them will not be useful. For example, if a new robot needs to be developed for healthcare, the Roboticists need to take into account the various factors from the persepective of the medical field, like the conditions of the patients that will be using it, and then modify the robot accordingly. Furthermore, businesses usually are based on products. Products which are based on other industries than business. Hence they need to have good information about that particular field so as to prosper. So, I feel that outside knowledge is beneficial for a field.
Secondly, I believe that observing things in the environment or knowing concepts from other fields can help in new innovations within a particular field or domain. For instance, career areas like Economics usually are based on how some things are made and the cost of their raw materials affect the overall price of the product and eventually creating an impact on the GDP of the country. If knowledge of these raw materials is less, the country will fail to give the correct GDP values and eventually the entire country will be affected. Therefore, knowledge from other fields is mandatory for a field to grow.
However, I concede that a few fields are completely dependent on the knowledge of themselves and do not need external information to be able to develop new concepts or theories. An example of one such field is Programming. The programming languages are based wholely and solely on the basis of the field of programming, yet this particualr domain has been growing exponentially over the years and has been able to produce various such languages and all of them being different and unique in their own ways. Hence, I feel that the prompt is not valid in such cases.
In conclusion, the prompt discusses a very important and complex topic. However, there is not one specific answer to this and the opinions can vary. But, according to me, the prompt is valid in almost all cases with a few exceptions as mentioned above.
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 58
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position 66
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 50
- Claim When planning courses educators should take into account the interests and suggestions of their students Reason Students are more motivated to learn when they are interested in what they are studying Write a response in which you discuss the extent 58
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 63
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
...ot accordingly. Furthermore, businesses usually are based on products. Products which are b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ased on other industries than business. Hence they need to have good information abou...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 743, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...information about that particular field so as to prosper. So, I feel that outside knowle...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2225.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90088105727 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74335559532 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486784140969 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.2372840479 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.136363636 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77272727273 5.21951772744 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231424603802 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777271331135 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601864069596 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126475560892 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587908570857 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 583, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[4]
Message: The adverb 'usually' is usually put after the verb 'are'.
Suggestion: are usually
...ot accordingly. Furthermore, businesses usually are based on products. Products which are b...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 674, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ased on other industries than business. Hence they need to have good information abou...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 743, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...information about that particular field so as to prosper. So, I feel that outside knowle...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, furthermore, hence, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, i feel, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2225.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 454.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90088105727 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61598047577 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74335559532 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486784140969 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 689.4 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.2372840479 60.3974514979 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.136363636 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6363636364 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77272727273 5.21951772744 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231424603802 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0777271331135 0.0831039109588 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601864069596 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126475560892 0.150359130593 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0587908570857 0.0667264976115 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 100.480337079 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.