No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study.
The argument claims that we cannot success in any field without the involvement of other areas. To some extent, I agree with this idea because a wide range of achievements or innovation came from concerted effort of many people and their expertises; however, this claim still too excessive to expand this notion to unjustifiable level. I will use several examples to substantiate my point of view.
Firstly, there are increasing needs of cooperation to make a project feasible today. With the advance of technology and civilization, we attain many achievements in almost every area but, at the same time, it also makes our world too sophisticated and complex to get achievements without cooperations. Therefore, in every corner of our industries, we can see the intervention among different areas. The modern movie industry is one example, it needs cooperative effort from marketing staff, animators and actor. Filming a successful movie needs people to survey on the market for the popular contents of today’s audience and need talented playwrights translate these things into script. And, animators are in charge of making effects on the film to realize the parts that are not physically attainable. Finally, actors who are versed at performing brings audiences infuse into the scene.
Furthermore, in the space exploration, one of the cutting-edge projects over the world can we see a lot of clues that integration of different field. To manufacture the space ship, scientists of material related field need to investigate the proper foam to insulate the extreme temperature during the flying of the space ship and durable material to sustain the high-energy radiation in the cosmo; the scientists of mechanics develop powerful engine to propel the space ship in to the orbit. Beside, the physicists are responsible for calculating the influences of gravity from different celestial objects so that accurate send the space ship accurately to its destination. This arduous task cannot success without any one of their effort.
However, I concede that there are still some attainments are based on the concentration of single field. The theoretical mathematic is one of examples. Math is a field that need fully concentration, accuracy is undoubtedly required so that a little logical or calculated defect can end up with the collapse of the theory. At the same time, by utilizing the brain power, mathematician can delve deep into abstract world and conceive imaginative and innovative ideas without outside help of other. Although, nowadays computer can accelerate them to speed up some routine tasks and organize some discrete data; but the crux of solving abstract problems are largely depends on mathematician their own.
To sum up, cooperation of different fields is a corollary of the sophistication that bring by the advancement of human being; the importance of cooperation do reflect on many areas. But, as the example I provide above, there are still some field can advance without the outside help from others. Therefore, we cannot dogmatically assert that success must involve different areas.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-03 | zanzendegi | 83 | view |
| 2023-01-21 | carlossouza | 66 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | yyh123 | 83 | view |
| 2021-08-07 | rachnabehl43 | 66 | view |
| 2021-03-07 | Kay_1998 | 83 | view |
- Most people choose a career on the basis of such pragmatic considerations as the needs of the economy the relative ease of finding a job and the salary they can expect to make Hardly anyone is free to choose a career based on his or her natural talents or 58
- Technology creates more problems than it solves and may threaten or damage the quality of life 58
- The best way to teach whether as an educator employer or parent is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones 66
- No field of study can advance significantly unless outsiders bring their knowledge and experience to that field of study 83
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement When teachers assign projects on which students must work together the students learn much more effectively than when they are asked to work alone on projects Use specific reasons and examples to suppo 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, so, still, therefore, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 84.0 58.6224719101 143% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 12.9106741573 155% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2628.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 494.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31983805668 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71445763274 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98008986436 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 270.0 215.323595506 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546558704453 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 847.8 704.065955056 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 68.7502967687 60.3974514979 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.454545455 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4545454545 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22727272727 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152025463795 0.243740707755 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437973265536 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0490786212189 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0920115751451 0.150359130593 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.054242208434 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.38706741573 113% => OK
difficult_words: 149.0 100.480337079 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.