Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways.

Essay topics:

Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways.

The base of the pyramid supports all the structure above it, similarly some unique, never thought before idea is required for supporting the other innovations. We cannot say that originality is just putting old ideas together. New ideas are essential to support other inventions and ideas. I will provide some examples and will shed more light on this topic in the passage below.

According to me, originality also means unwrapping innovative things and coming up with unique ideas. Everyone knows about satellites and how they are helping to revolutionize the technological world, society, and humankind around us. Rocket propulsion is the main part of Satellites launching procedure and is not an originality according to the definition mentioned in the statement. But, Rocket propulsion is not merely amalgam of some old ideas together, it is something that was never thought before. So, originality does include thinking something that was never thought before and also means coming up with something innovative things. Hence, new ideas are required to come up with other inventions in the future. But just putting old ideas together is not the only definition of an Originality.

Furthermore, we can see example of Facebook and other social networks. These correctly fit into the definition of originality mentioned in the statement as they just put old idea of AOL, Orkut, etc. in a different way. But, there was existing original idea of social network that was developed by AOL which helped in development of other ideas. Thus, we can see, new ideas are required for development of other ideas and originality also means thinking completely new things.

There are other places where humankind came up with new things by putting old ideas together, but these ideas were not merely developed by putting some stuff together in an cutting edge way. These were real, path-breaking ideas which helped in the development of other inventions. Everyone knows about internet, we use it daily more than anything else. It was invented by DARPA, a military research organization of USA and now we are using it for totally different purpose. As we can again see, internet was developed by putting old idea came up by DARPA, but DARPA's idea is the base and was totally new idea.

In my opinion, Originality means putting some old ideas together in new way and also coming up with new groundbreaking things. I disagree with the definition of Originality mentioned in the statement give to me.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-02 amruta3097 50 view
2019-09-19 nkuruppath641@gmail.com 50 view
2019-09-19 nkuruppath641@gmail.com 50 view
2019-07-26 mb94 33 view
2019-02-17 devjoshi 57 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user anurag21 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
... on this topic in the passage below. According to me, originality also means unwrapping inno...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 200, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a different way" with adverb for "different"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y just put old idea of AOL, Orkut, etc. in a different way. But, there was existing original idea ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 171, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...loped by putting some stuff together in an cutting edge way. These were real, path...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, similarly, so, thus, as to, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2089.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 408.0 442.535393258 92% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12009803922 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78666769969 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 215.323595506 83% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.438725490196 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 694.8 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.603543251 60.3974514979 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.8260869565 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7391304348 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30434782609 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 14.0 4.83258426966 290% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419868864945 0.243740707755 172% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.122522770861 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.110658545102 0.0758088955206 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.253339879832 0.150359130593 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0805448616947 0.0667264976115 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 48.8420337079 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.12 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.69 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.