As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The writer of the issue claims that people’s ability to think for themselves will debilitate as they rely more and more on technology. This is a contention with which I generally agree for the following reasons.
First, by relying on technology to solve problems, humans do not see the necessity to think over various problems and issues they are faced with. The human brain, like other organs of our body, needs to work in order to continue to function. If we do not force our brains to work, it becomes inactive overtime and thus, it loses its ability to function efficiently and always relies on external sources to provide solutions.
Furthermore, there are some problems that are better solved by humans than means of technology. Robots and computers are not equipped with the ability to learn, and thus, they lack the privilege of imagination. Therefore, these means cannot find the optimal way to solve each of human life problems. Moreover, if humans rely on these means to solve every problem they are faced with, they will lose their own imagination over time as well, and the human civilization will certainly fall in the near future.
However, we should not disregard the impact of using technology in solving the problems humans are incapable to solve. There are numerous issues in engineering, architecture, and even social studies which were unconquerable by humans, yet advent of technology helped people to find solutions to these problems. Without technology and computers, humans are not able to apply proposed methods which supposedly solve this type of problems, and thus, efficiently exploit the resources to overcome the barriers in various aspects of their lives.
In essence, using means of technology certainly helps people to overcome the problems which were supposed invincible in the past. Yet, applying technology in all of the problems worsen the human’s ability to think, and thus leads to human fall in the end.
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 50
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating, and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes litt 49
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? With the help of technology, students nowadays can learn more information and learn it more quickly. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate. 54
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 36, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The writer of the issue claims that people's ability to think for thems...
^^
Line 6, column 158, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...n the past. Yet, applying technology in all of the problems worsen the human's abilit...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, even so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1643.0 2235.4752809 73% => OK
No of words: 320.0 442.535393258 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.134375 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.55969084622 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70647191642 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.534375 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 521.1 704.065955056 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 20.2370786517 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4056545971 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.357142857 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298865808465 0.243740707755 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107978783029 0.0831039109588 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.063844323043 0.0758088955206 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182966770773 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0798904665771 0.0667264976115 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 100.480337079 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.