As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
With technological development, it is possible to solve problems easier than before. We can pay bills, have classes, do groceries, shopping, work, and so on. It's possible to do these without going out or with less effort than ever.
It's a global tendency to rely on technology more and more to solve our problems. Are we getting technology dependents?
Some people believe that technology is deteriorating our ability to solve problems by ourselves, but I believe that technology is actually improving our ability to solve problems. It does not let us lose time solving banal problems like pay a bill. It increases our creativity as we have more resources, let us analyze the same issue from different perspectives, and increase our communication.
Thanks to technology, we do not have to waste our time doing some manual or low intellectual activities which leaves us time to solve more complex issues. For example, instead of spend hours on a plane to have a meeting, it's possible to have an online meeting. In this way, we could spend that time really working and producing, instead of traveling to just get there. Here, the technology is not making us unable to solve problems, but it's actually letting us available to solve more complex problems.
The technological growth allows us to develop some skills that were more difficult to develop before, this can increase our ability to solve problems by ourselves without being technology dependent. Nowadays, we have access to contents that were really rare to find, like a language spoken by a not-civilized nation But now, with internet and online platforms, it's possible to find some content about it just researching online or making contact with some specialist anywhere. In this case, technology helps us making a bridge to the content, but it is not responsible for our internal knowledge development.
As a result of technological development, communication and transportation are easier than ever. There is a worldwide content about the same issue what help us to analyze different perspectives of the same thing. This develops our critical reasoning and invites us to think out of the box. Back in the past, only privileged people could write in a newspaper or appear on a tv show, they would only give their perspective about something. Not to mention that they could say anything, true or not, people would not have different perspective or someone to run the opposite side. Nowadays, the media is more democratic because anyone with internet access can write in a blog, comment a new or even produce a YouTube channel. It has shown us different perspectives, uncovering lies, and leading us to research more about the same issue. So, technological development invites us to think out of the box, increasing our ability to solve problems.
Some people argue that technology development deteriorated our ability to solve social and behavioral problems as we are so used to deal with each other through a scream. It's worthy to remember that technology made possible a worldwide communication never seen before, how it could decrease our social abilities once we can connect with different cultures, nations, timezone, etc. Actually, we learned to communicate with each other, going out of our bubble, thanks to technology development.
As the technological developments rise as it gets more common to integrate this in multiples areas of our life. This fact could give us an impression that we are getting technology dependent and we can not solve problems without it. But, if you look deeply, it saves us time and energy to deal with more complex and meaningful issues, it can develop our skills, facilitates worldwide communication and information. Technology just deteriorates the abilities of those who like to stay in the comfort zone without learning and thinking out of the box.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Mridul | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | chrissyready | 66 | view |
- Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ 54
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 39
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...ing out or with less effort than ever. Its a global tendency to rely on technology...
^^^
Line 3, column 396, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ctives, and increase our communication. Thanks to technology, we do not have to ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 512, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[9]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to make' or 'make'.
Suggestion: to make; make
...here. In this case, technology helps us making a bridge to the content, but it is not ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, if, look, really, so, for example, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 25.0 14.8657303371 168% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 81.0 33.0505617978 245% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 88.0 58.6224719101 150% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3236.0 2235.4752809 145% => OK
No of words: 632.0 442.535393258 143% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12025316456 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.01394158123 4.55969084622 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94679731314 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443037974684 0.4932671777 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1041.3 704.065955056 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 20.0 6.24550561798 320% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 6.0 1.77640449438 338% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 30.0 20.2370786517 148% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.6887621074 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.866666667 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0666666667 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.03333333333 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200913797143 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654556654598 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0535421677507 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120045940283 0.150359130593 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459859922419 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.85 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 100.480337079 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.