As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Human beings are largely dependent on technology is no secret. Mankind has always strived to improve and upgrade their living conditions. But has this need for comfort has made us completely dependent on technology that we it will eventually destroy our thinking capability? The simple answer is "NO". To elaborate this idea let us look into the various factors associated with it.
We are today surrounded by technology. Even the smallest of a task, like brushing our teeth, can be done easily and effectively by an electric toothbrush. A trivial object like an electric toothbrush is an innovation that has resulted from mankind's desire for something better than what we already have. Scientists are working day and night to provide the rest of the world with discoveries and inventions that helps us in our everyday life. Take for example, the World Wide Web, which made sharing of information throughout the globe a very simple and quick feat. People from all over the world are able to communicate, share knowledge, host businesses and keep abreast about the latest update just by tapping a few keys. The internet is just one the many examples of technology that has helped us to carry out tasks in much more efficient manner. The primary purpose of any invention is to improve the current state, achieve the desired task in much lesser time and/or find solutions to complex-intricate problems. If a technology is not used to its fullest potential, what is the purpose of such a technology? In summary, the reliance on technology should not be viewed in a negative light completely.
The other aspect of the given issue that people will end up deteriorating their thinking ability, is a bit of an overstatement. Science and technology go hand in hand and have been with us from the beginning of mankind. Be it the Homo sapiens hunting tools, the invention of the wheel or the polio vaccine. History proves that humans have never stopped their research for a better future. This in turn proves that dependency on technology has not hampered with the thinking capability of human beings. Some might argue that only the erudite and experts from the scientific field are the people who are racking their brains to come up with all the new technology and thus the common man is only enjoying the final outcome which in turn leads to dependence on technology and ultimately reduction of one's mental aptitude. In such case, it is necessary to understand that a man's thinking, reasoning and questioning is not limited to only technological fields. A businessman who is dependent on his cellphone for contacting various clients, has to do the real work of explaining his products and persuading the client for making a deal. People are indeed relying more and more on technology to solve problems, but that is only so that they can concentrate on much bigger and important issues.
To conclude, it would be farfetched to assume humans might end up degrading their thinking ability with increased reliance on technology to solve problem. Humans in all categories of field (like science, medicine, education, art, politics) are always trying to advance, grow and improve irrespective of the dependency on technology.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-22 | pranav_kanth | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-17 | sefeliz | 58 | view |
| 2020-01-12 | shuocurity | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Mridul | 66 | view |
| 2019-12-31 | chrissyready | 66 | view |
- All too often, companies hire outside consultants to suggest ways for the company to operate more efficiently. If companies were to spend more time listening to their own employees, such consultants would be unnecessary.Write a response in which you discu 50
- Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented. The given issue 50
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr. Karp, an anthropologist."Twenty years ago, Dr. Field, a noted anthropologist, visited the island of Tertia andconcluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village 82
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 66
- Many lives might be saved if inoculations against cow flu were routinely administered to all people in areas where the disease is detected. However, since there is a small possibility that a person will die as a result of the inoculations, we cannot permi 63
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Human beings are largely dependent on te...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arious factors associated with it. We are today surrounded by technology. E...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed in a negative light completely. The other aspect of the given issue that...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... much bigger and important issues. To conclude, it would be farfetched to a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, thus, as to, for example, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 77.0 58.6224719101 131% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2701.0 2235.4752809 121% => OK
No of words: 536.0 442.535393258 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.03917910448 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.81161862636 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8448696951 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 287.0 215.323595506 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.535447761194 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 855.0 704.065955056 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7418903237 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.884615385 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11538461538 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23227153061 0.243740707755 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0560932651813 0.0831039109588 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499604172552 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133643603018 0.150359130593 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565137584182 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.1392134831 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 135.0 100.480337079 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.