The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagreewith the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take.In developing and supp

Essay topics:

The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.

Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree

with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take.

In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in

which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and

explain how these examples shape your position.

Positive words of encouragement can do wonders to boost up one's morale. Even at the most hopeless moment in our life, if a closed one or acquitance gives us few praises, it can galvanize us to do better. But at the same time ignoring negative actions can do us much harm than good. That is why the issue's claim is only halfway persuasive.

To elaborate, it is often witnessed that when a person is approbated for his actions, he will further try to improve himself. A human being always tries to improve, upgrade or better himself at any given moment of time. This can be evidenced from the innumerable discoveries and innovations that has been recored in history itself. Praising postive actions in a way guides us to the correct path we must follow. This is not only applicable to human beings alone. Take for example dogs or puppies. The best way to train a dog is found through positive re-enforcement. Even an untrained dog will quicly pick up habits that will earn him treats or "good boy" praises from his master. So to apply this formula on humans who are much more evolved than our naive pets will sure bring out the best in them.

On the other hand, to ignore negative actions can do us more harm than we can imagine. When a negative action is ignored, the person will never get to know what he has done was wrong. This doesn't mean negative acts should be punished severely or critised. It is very important that from an early age a child is taught what is morally right and what is morally wrong. The more better way to deal with negative actions is to explain the person what he did was not acceptable and why it is considered not acceptable. Also, he should also be adviced on how he can improve himself. Small negative habits can in turn grow into much more worse actions if not acknowledged and corrected.

Therefore, it is necessary not to ignore negative actions but to rather address them. At the same time, it is also necessary to praise postive acts so as to encourage them futher.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-13 jason123 16 view
2020-01-13 jason123 16 view
2019-12-15 olaelamin 66 view
2019-12-14 Raunaq 66 view
2019-11-27 alexgretest 58 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user kelly1237 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Positive words of encouragement can do w...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... claim is only halfway persuasive. To elaborate, it is often witnessed that...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... sure bring out the best in them. On the other hand, to ignore negative ac...
^^
Line 9, column 192, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...o know what he has done was wrong. This doesnt mean negative acts should be punished s...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 374, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
...ly right and what is morally wrong. The more better way to deal with negative actions is to...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 629, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'worse' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: worse
...ative habits can in turn grow into much more worse actions if not acknowledged and correct...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...if not acknowledged and corrected. Therefore, it is necessary not to ignore...
^^
Line 13, column 151, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...s also necessary to praise postive acts so as to encourage them futher.
^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, therefore, as to, for example, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 58.6224719101 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1664.0 2235.4752809 74% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58402203857 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.48871810256 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542699724518 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 704.065955056 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.9892615181 60.3974514979 46% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 75.6363636364 118.986275619 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 23.4991977007 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.04545454545 5.21951772744 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115097192472 0.243740707755 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386109070565 0.0831039109588 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368070538746 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0703885654191 0.150359130593 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121717491077 0.0667264976115 18% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 14.1392134831 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.8420337079 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.1743820225 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.99 12.1639044944 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 100.480337079 72% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.