People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and
explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should
consider the reasons for which the statement may or may not be true and explain how these considerations shape your position
It has been said that people should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively. While arguments can be made for either case, it is prudent and responsible for people to regularly question authority. One notable point is that rules are made by people, and thus fallible. Another reason is that rules should serve some beneficial purpose, otherwise people will not follow them. For these reasons, authority should be frequently checked.
People make mistakes. No matter their title and status, rulers and rule makers are not perfect. Society’s needs and mores are always changing. As such, rules need changing on a regular basis too. Looking to Darwinism, we can see that animals which don’t adapt to the world around them are not likely to survive. In order to ensure the continued survival of the group, people must always speak up to ensure the authoritative body is adapting to the ever changing consensus.
Rules must serve some positive purpose or else no-one will follow them. For example, reduced speed limit signs on the highway in construction zones are less likely to be followed when no construction is actively occurring. Some rules are made during war-time and no longer relevant and serving a positive purpose. Thus challenging outdated regulations is a positive thing.
One might argue that following the rules without question will promote a society with less strive. But this assumes that the regulations are always beneficial. This is not always the case. If a rule is clearly hurting a large group it is certainly worth expunging.
While following the rules is taught to children as the correct course of action, for adults it is not the best course of action. People are prone to making mistakes, and a constantly evolving ruleset will outstrip a fixed one.
- A recent study by the Center for Disease Control and Prevention found that employees with paid sick leave are 28 percent less likely to be involved in a work related accident than employees who do not receive payment for sick leave Researchers hypothesize 50
- Schools should do more to prepare students for the non academic aspects of adulthood Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In devoting and supporting your position be sure to address the most compel 58
- People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...eneficial. This is not always the case. If a rule is clearly hurting a large group...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, so, thus, while, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 58.6224719101 43% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 299.0 442.535393258 68% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09698996656 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56722024605 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 215.323595506 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571906354515 0.4932671777 116% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 23.0359550562 61% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2431946853 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.5714285714 118.986275619 61% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.2380952381 23.4991977007 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.04761904762 5.21951772744 39% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20019208643 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575266888894 0.0831039109588 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.058777974555 0.0758088955206 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10214804534 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0741649857689 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.7 14.1392134831 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 48.8420337079 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 12.1743820225 72% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 5.0 11.8971910112 42% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 11.2143820225 68% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.