People should question the rules of authority as opposed to accepting them passively
The authorities are responsible for enabling an environment that is amicable, safe and just for the people. This is achieved by setting rules and orders, which one is expected to follow diligently. The authorities have every possibility to become biased and function askew leading to more harm to a society than good. It becomes necessary to keep a check on them through questioning the rules set forth by them.
It must be also understood that authorities are bodies that are made up by the people themselves by entrusting them power willfully. If the questioning of each and every rule and actions are done then it might impact the functioning of the authority itself. I would like to take an example of a recently passed rule that penalizes with hefty fine on traffic violations, makes seat belts and helmets compulsory for drivers and rides in India. The rule met with heavy resistance from the people. This is because they are never used to following such strict rules before but this is required for their own and others safety on road. Questioning and protesting against such rules would be a loss for society in long run.
On the other hand being a complete docile and keeping a passive attitude is equally bad. If the people start agreeing to everything that the authorities approve then it would lead to a situation where the society becomes totalitarian. An example would be case when the state decided to impose censorship. This would be a violation of fundamental right to freedom of expression and in such cases people must come out and question the authority. Failure of which will only lead to authorities becoming powerful and possibly corrupt, as there would be no check mechanism.
What is needed is therefore a balance of both. The people must definitely question the authority from time to time but it should not become so repetitive that it renders the functioning of authority nugatory.
- In order to help small businesses thrive, government should play a minimal role in private business matters. 41
- The charts below show the popularity of different political parties in a country before and after the general election The election was won by the Conservative Party and they formed a government with the Liberal Democrats Summarise the information by sele 41
- In surveys Mason City residents rank water sports (swimming, boating and fishing) among their favorite recreational activities. The Mason River flowing through the city is rarely used for these pursuits, however, and the city park department devotes littl 54
- "Our previous experience has been that our stores are most profitable in areas where residents are highly concerned with leading healthy lives. We should therefore build one of our new stores in Plainsville, which clearly has many such residents. Plainsvi 50
- Cot-Ten, a cotton production company, has recently faced profitability issues based on the use ofChemical X in its manufacturing process. The main by-product produced when using Chemical X iscovered under stringent environmental regulations, making it ver 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 718, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ould be a loss for society in long run. On the other hand being a complete docil...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 90, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ping a passive attitude is equally bad. If the people start agreeing to everything...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.220289855072 0.240241500013 92% => OK
Verbs: 0.182608695652 0.157235817809 116% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0666666666667 0.0880659088768 76% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0492753623188 0.0497285424764 99% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0405797101449 0.0444667217837 91% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115942028986 0.12292977631 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0608695652174 0.0406280797675 150% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.72322809724 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0376811594203 0.030933414821 122% => OK
Particles: 0.00579710144928 0.0016655270985 348% => OK
Determiners: 0.115942028986 0.0997080785238 116% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0347826086957 0.0249443105267 139% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0202898550725 0.0148568991511 137% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1921.0 2732.02544248 70% => OK
No of words: 324.0 452.878318584 72% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92901234568 6.0361032391 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.58838876751 92% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.327160493827 0.366273622748 89% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.265432098765 0.280924506359 94% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.175925925926 0.200843997647 88% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.12962962963 0.132149295362 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72322809724 2.79330140395 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 219.290929204 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558641975309 0.48968727796 114% => OK
Word variations: 60.237360681 55.4138127331 109% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0588235294 23.380412469 82% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6717412867 59.4972553346 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.0 141.124799967 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0588235294 23.380412469 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.411764705882 0.674092028746 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 45.602033406 51.4728631049 89% => OK
Elegance: 1.45744680851 1.64882698954 88% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330366861989 0.391690518653 84% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0883220664371 0.123202303941 72% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0544961470775 0.077325440228 70% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.481201790096 0.547984918172 88% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.117248308476 0.149214159877 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121777573282 0.161403998019 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0745550927411 0.0892212321368 84% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.37647402426 0.385218514788 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0647188178096 0.0692045440612 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.239157137399 0.275328986314 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0366675811261 0.0653680567796 56% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.4325221239 38% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.30420353982 170% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88274336283 82% => OK
Positive topic words: 3.0 7.22455752212 42% => OK
Negative topic words: 9.0 3.66592920354 246% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.