People should undertake risky action only after they have carefully considered its consequences.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
In our everyday life we frequently might need to make a decision among different possibilities, and everytime we make a choice we should always consider its consequences. Especially for risky actions, which could lead to serious consequences, people should carefully think about what they can lead them to before undertaking them. Nevertheless, there are certain circumstances in which thinking about the consequences is not the best thing to do. That is why I partially agree with adopting this recommendation.
First, let’s focus on some of the circumstances in which considering the consequences of risky actions is preferable. Based on the global pandemic we’re currently facing, going to a stadium or a concert, as well as taking public transportations without a mask, could be considered risky actions. Even though people, especially teenagers, can get tired of wearing a mask or renouncing from attending the events they love, thinking about the consequences of those risky actions should be enough to stop them from doing something they would regret. For example, let’s suppose that the above cited concert, stadium, or public transportations turned out to be outbreaks of Covid-19, and that the teenagers in question would have got it. Soon they would have realized that risking their, and moreover their families, health conditions was not worth it, and that it all could have been easily avoided just by considering such consequences.
On the other hand, there are some cases in which consequences for risky actions should not be considered. For example, let’s think of stuntmen and people who practice extreme sports such as skydiving, free climbing or even bungee jumping. It is needless to say that each of these risky actions would lead to dramatic consequences if not death. Thus, people who undertake them should not consider them in advance. Instead, they should think about the adrenaline and the feeling of freedom that only these extreme sports can give them.
In conclusion, I would say that in most of the cases people should consider every possible consequence before undertaking a risky action. Even though there are some particular circumstances in which focusing on just the dramatic consequences does not come in handy, people have to use their own judgement to choose whether it is really worth risking it.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-07 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-06-06 | ice123 | 58 | view |
| 2022-09-30 | YACHI PATEL | 50 | view |
| 2022-08-24 | Sujan Adhikari | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | Tee_Jay | 33 | view |
- Claim In any field business politics education government those in power should step down after five years Reason The surest path to success for any enterprise is revitalization through new leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to wh 66
- It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compel 70
- The main benefit of the study of history is to dispel the illusion that people living now are significantly different from people who lived in earlier times Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 66
- Claim Though often considered an objective pursuit learning about the historical past requires creativity Reason Because we can never know the past directly we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts documents and artifacts W 92
- The following appeared in an article written by Dr Karp an anthropologist Twenty years ago Dr Field a noted anthropologist visited the island of Tertia and concluded from his observations that children in Tertia were reared by an entire village rather tha 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ecommendation. First, let’s focus on some of the circumstances in which considering the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... whether it is really worth risking it.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, nevertheless, really, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1980.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91886614211 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 589.5 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.77640449438 281% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.3968237466 60.3974514979 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.75 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4375 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.8125 5.21951772744 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272331242194 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0988813491894 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0491300710982 0.0758088955206 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180318891911 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00883346043744 0.0667264976115 13% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 100.480337079 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.