People should undertake risky action only after they have considered the consequences.
Our actions define who we are and it is vital that we properly consider our choices. Especially in situations having risk, it is important that we calculate the impact of our actions as it would not only impact us, but also impact people connected to us. One might argue that taking into account the consequences may lead to procastination and ultimately to no progress, but if the probable damage is higher it is better to avoid taking risks. Therefore, I feel that considering consequences before taking a risky action can save us from a disaster.
Firstly, considering the consequences can help us decide if the impact can be controlled or not. Depending upon the degree of control over the ultimate implications, we can take a call to take up the task or not. For instance, today with the help of advanced genetics we can bring back extinct creatures to life. Assuming we re-introduce dinosaurs to this new age, we would witness destruction at a massive scala. Dinosaurs were gigantic creatures and we would not be able to provide them the required habitat. Further, the food chain which is currently quite stable, would severly be impacted. Here, the control does not lie in our hands and it would be best if we restrict our actions.
Secondly, at times we are quite confident of our actions and ignore the slightest of the risks. Not giving proper thought thus could in this case lead to unwanted results. Consider the example of situation at present in Ukraine. It wanted to join the NATO to stengthen its position in the European union. This action has now backfired as it now doesn't have any support from the NATO and has lost an ally, i.e. Russia, which now sees it as an enemy. Ukraine was confident that it would get all the required support from the NATO in case of an act of aggression from Russia, but that did not happen. As a result, the people of Ukraine are paying a price for it. Moreover, this has also impacted the world economy with trades between countries now being stalled.
In summary, evaluating the probable implications of our risky actions can help us avoid any undesirable situations. Proper understanding and planning of series of events to follow can keep us prepared for what is to follow and not bring up any surprises, bringing predictability and proper control.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-18 | mskandula | 75 | view |
| 2022-04-21 | shyamforever | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-13 | pushpull | 33 | view |
| 2019-09-06 | jayjaydangar96@gmail.com | view | |
| 2018-10-02 | NinadKD | 50 | view |
- You moved to a new country and you want to write a letter to your former colleague In your letter you should tell him her where did you go and what you are doing there job describe your feeling invite your friend to come 69
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate 50
- The following memo was published by the Welzaton City Commission A recent nationwide study of the effectiveness of wearing a safety helmet while bicycling indicates that ten years ago approximately 35 percent of all bicyclists reported wearing helmets whe 57
- In some areas in the US a curfew is imposed in which teenagers are not allowed to be out of doors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult What is your opinion about this 89
- Many people work long hours leaving very little time for leisure activities Does this situation has more advantages or more disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 345, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...This action has now backfired as it now doesnt have any support from the NATO and has ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, for instance, i feel, in summary, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 46.0 33.0505617978 139% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1906.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 399.0 442.535393258 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77694235589 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46933824581 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70032883283 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.521303258145 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 600.3 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.3560123939 60.3974514979 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.7619047619 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 23.4991977007 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47619047619 5.21951772744 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135470903301 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415168804013 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0541776097647 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0882098712467 0.150359130593 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725937441769 0.0667264976115 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 14.1392134831 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 100.480337079 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.